Polbot was once a bot, and is no longer with us. If you like, you can leave me a message at User talk:Quadell.

Any auto-generated notices about articles-for-deletion or whatnot are rather moot, and make about as much sense as talking to a non-functioning food processor.

Category:Ambystoma

edit

Category:Ambystoma, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Animalparty-- (talk) 08:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Chat flycatcher

edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:29, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Boss Perot listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Boss Perot. Since you had some involvement with the The Boss Perot redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Steven W. Smith for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven W. Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven W. Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Derek Andrews (talk) 00:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Mentawai squirrel) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Mentawai squirrel, Polbot!

Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed as part of page curation, interesting short article on squirrel species. Good work with references and categories now. Kieranian2001 (talk) 14:26, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Peripatopsis alba

edit

Hello Polbot,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Peripatopsis alba for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 (talk) 08:39, 17 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Peripatopsis clavigera

edit

Hello Polbot,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Peripatopsis clavigera for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 (talk) 08:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Peripatopsis leonina

edit

Hello Polbot,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Peripatopsis leonina for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 (talk) 08:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Guavo

edit

Hi, I'm ABF99. Polbot, thanks for creating Guavo!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add some references to independent reliable sources to your page Guavo.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. ABF99 (talk) 20:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Richard Frost (disambiguation) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Frost (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Frost (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 21:36, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Richard Pence listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Richard Pence. Since you had some involvement with the Richard Pence redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Nohomersryan (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of John Beckham

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Beckham, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mr. Vernon (talk) 01:12, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of John Beckham for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Beckham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Beckham until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravenswing 05:02, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Colibri À Tête Rose listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Colibri À Tête Rose. Since you had some involvement with the Colibri À Tête Rose redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Colibri À TÊTe Rose listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Colibri À TÊTe Rose. Since you had some involvement with the Colibri À TÊTe Rose redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:37, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ColibrÍ Florido listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ColibrÍ Florido. Since you had some involvement with the ColibrÍ Florido redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:43, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Colibrí Florido listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Colibrí Florido. Since you had some involvement with the Colibrí Florido redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:43, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Writer's Barnstar
Without the help of Polbot, we still probably wouldn't have articles for every U.S. Representative. MB298 (talk) 00:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of J. Lewis for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J. Lewis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Lewis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rayman60 (talk) 22:09, 21 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Evelyn Keller (disambiguation)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Evelyn Keller (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Boleyn (talk) 11:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of James Mount

edit
 

The article James Mount has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not supported by WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

ÑAndubay listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ÑAndubay. Since you had some involvement with the ÑAndubay redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 06:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of James Perkins Jr. for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Perkins Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Perkins Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 14:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Carl Hoffman

edit
 

The article Carl Hoffman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wlmg (talk) 02:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jonathan Bullock

edit
 

The article Jonathan Bullock has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PRehse (talk) 16:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Isshū Nagata

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Isshū Nagata requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DrStrauss talk 15:32, 29 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kōyō Yasumoto

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kōyō Yasumoto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DrStrauss talk 20:06, 2 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Nan'yō Yasumoto

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nan'yō Yasumoto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DrStrauss talk 20:07, 2 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Thomas Alvord for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Alvord is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Alvord until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 02:53, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Yoshikawa Tomizo

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yoshikawa Tomizo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DrStrauss talk 13:21, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Yoshikawa Tomizo

edit
 

The article Yoshikawa Tomizo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ANYBIO. Few sources give any significant coverage on him.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrStrauss talk 16:45, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Yoshikawa Tomizo for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yoshikawa Tomizo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoshikawa Tomizo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrStrauss talk 18:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Robert G. Klausner

edit
 

The article Robert G. Klausner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No third party reliable source. Judge doesn't seem to be particularly notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wlmg (talk) 23:56, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

About Catherine Perry

edit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Catherine Perry a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ─ 1997kB 08:25, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Major Patten listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Major Patten. Since you had some involvement with the Major Patten redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Bernard "Bernie" Sanders

edit
 

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

 Diako «  Talk » 00:17, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Takeo Komatsu

edit
 

The article Takeo Komatsu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No in-depth sources located that would grant a WP:GNG pass, and makes no claims to pass any criteria of WP:NARTIST aside from claiming to be "renowned". Automatically generated by Polbot years ago, but no indication as to where from. No ja.wiki article to check for sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 21:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Keizaburō Saeki for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keizaburō Saeki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keizaburō Saeki until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC(talk) 19:31, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Keitarō Iketani for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keitarō Iketani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keitarō Iketani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC(talk) 13:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Yoshihiko Itō for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yoshihiko Itō is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoshihiko Itō until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC(talk) 23:38, 18 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ichirō Kosaka for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ichirō Kosaka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ichirō Kosaka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC(talk) 10:24, 31 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Yūsen Kojima for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yūsen Kojima is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yūsen Kojima until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC(talk) 07:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hypoxantha listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hypoxantha. Since you had some involvement with the Hypoxantha redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Paul_012 (talk) 10:43, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hiroshi Sumitomo for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hiroshi Sumitomo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiroshi Sumitomo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC(talk) 10:29, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kōshi Takeshita for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kōshi Takeshita is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kōshi Takeshita until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC(talk) 09:40, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ichirō Tanaka for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ichirō Tanaka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ichirō Tanaka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC(talk) 10:56, 2 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mizuo Tamai for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mizuo Tamai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mizuo Tamai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC(talk) 16:36, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Richard Clough Anderson listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Richard Clough Anderson. Since you had some involvement with the Richard Clough Anderson redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --David Tornheim (talk) 18:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ryūkichi Narita for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryūkichi Narita is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryūkichi Narita until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC(talk) 05:28, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jon Martin

edit
 

The article Jon Martin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that subject meets WP:NMUSICBIO. No independent, reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 13:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Gorō Hobo for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gorō Hobo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorō Hobo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC(talk) 00:52, 9 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Phaeomyias

edit

Hello, Polbot,

Thanks for creating Phaeomyias! I edit here too, under the username MrClog and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The article should at least cite one more independent secondary source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MrClog}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MrClog (talk) 10:23, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Suiriri

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Suiriri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:58, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

David Lieberman listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect David Lieberman. Since you had some involvement with the David Lieberman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Zerach (talk) 06:08, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Anurolimnas

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Anurolimnas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 22:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Yonetarō Murata for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yonetarō Murata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yonetarō Murata until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC(talk) 23:29, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Eiji Ubusawa for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eiji Ubusawa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eiji Ubusawa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC(talk) 00:15, 23 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nogami Tohru for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nogami Tohru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nogami Tohru until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC(talk) 11:57, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Phanerophlebiopsis

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Phanerophlebiopsis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Calluella

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Calluella requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:52, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ramanella

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Ramanella requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:12, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Caudacaecilia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Caudacaecilia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:04, 5 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Parvicaecilia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Parvicaecilia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:28, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ocadia has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Ocadia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 18:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Albericus

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Albericus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:54, 14 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sinoradlkofera

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Sinoradlkofera requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:39, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Asparagus sp. nov. A

edit
 

The article Asparagus sp. nov. A has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Undescribed species that fails WP:V because there are a number of these "sp. nov. A" from various countries. By now may well be a duplicate of one of the 212 named species. Drawn from a 2007 database.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 08:11, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Oxydactyla

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Oxydactyla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:56, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Liophryne

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Liophryne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Batrachylodes

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Batrachylodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:56, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Discodeles

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Discodeles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Silurana

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Silurana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:49, 27 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Allocharopa

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Allocharopa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:56, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:NearDeathNote.JPG

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:NearDeathNote.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

"LÚGano De Yarrell" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect LÚGano De Yarrell should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 24#LÚGano De Yarrell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:04, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Elijah V. Brookshire for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elijah V. Brookshire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elijah V. Brookshire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CassiantoTalk 19:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Luciobarbus pallaryi for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luciobarbus pallaryi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luciobarbus pallaryi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JTZegers (talk) 19:27, 12 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

"J. R.R. Tolkien" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect J. R.R. Tolkien. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 23#J. R.R. Tolkien until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:32, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cromileptes

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Cromileptes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 03:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Corydon has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Corydon has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:47, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Cualac has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Cualac has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fagus has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Fagus has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nesoclopeus

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Nesoclopeus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lophozosterops

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Lophozosterops requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Trichastoma

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Trichastoma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:15, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pselliophorus

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Pselliophorus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:55, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hemispingus

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Hemispingus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:26, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Joan B. Gottschall

edit
 

The article Joan B. Gottschall has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —S Marshall T/C 15:37, 8 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Loriculus has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Loriculus has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —⁠andrybak (talk) 10:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Buthraupis

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Buthraupis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:48, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cnemoscopus

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Cnemoscopus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:51, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Born: Dec 21, 1937" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Born: Dec 21, 1937. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 7#Born: Dec 21, 1937 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Nohomersryan (talk) 23:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Born: March 18, 1941" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Born: March 18, 1941. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 7#Born: March 18, 1941 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tijuca (bird)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Tijuca (bird) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Musophaga

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Musophaga requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tyrrheniella

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Tyrrheniella requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Keiichi Akimoto

edit
 

The article Keiichi Akimoto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't think this one passes WP:GNG. A WP:BEFORE search shows no available RS in neither the English or the Japanese google. The article is incredibly vague in terms of writing. This article doesn't tell anything about who she was or what she did.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 14:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pseudoacanthocereus

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Pseudoacanthocereus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Born January 22, 1955" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Born January 22, 1955. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 24#Born January 22, 1955 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Nohomersryan (talk) 19:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Born June 23, 1955" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Born June 23, 1955. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 24#Born June 23, 1955 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Huilaea

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Huilaea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Joseph A. Manchin III**" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Joseph A. Manchin III**. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 11#Joseph A. Manchin III** until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 03:08, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pausinystalia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Pausinystalia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:44, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Koroku Ōkubo

edit
 

The article Koroku Ōkubo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable photographer that fails WP:BASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 02:05, 8 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tadayuki Kawahito

edit
 

The article Tadayuki Kawahito has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Bot-created article from 2007, of which a significant number have been deleted over the years for failing WP:NARTIST/WP:GNG. No substantial coverage found about him on a search of the name in English and Japanese order, as well as the Japanese characters of his name. No Japanese wiki article to swipe from, and a search there turned up nothing either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 06:08, 9 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hildebrandtia (animal)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Hildebrandtia (animal) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:52, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Platydesma

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Platydesma indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pipa (genus)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Pipa (genus) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:49, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Krokia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Krokia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Gomidesia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Gomidesia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Marlierea

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Marlierea indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:42, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mitranthes

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Mitranthes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pseudocarapa

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Pseudocarapa indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:47, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Leptostylis

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Leptostylis indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

"St Cotton" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect St Cotton and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 28#St Cotton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 17:21, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

"New Five" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect New Five and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 28#New Five until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 17:40, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Jerome III Apt" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Jerome III Apt and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 28#Jerome III Apt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 17:49, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Gordon S." listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Gordon S. and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 28#Gordon S. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 17:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Earl Jr" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Earl Jr and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 28#Earl Jr until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 17:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

"William W. II" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect William W. II and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 28#William W. II until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 17:54, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

"William Jr" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect William Jr and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 28#William Jr until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 17:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

"The W. Boy" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The W. Boy and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 28#The W. Boy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 17:57, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

"El Neil" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect El Neil and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 28#El Neil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 17:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Amazona has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Amazona has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Novem Linguae (talk) 12:52, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rhachis

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Rhachis indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Masanori Ashida

edit
 

The article Masanori Ashida has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Automatically generated by Polbot years ago. Although some museums hold prints by this subject, no in-depth sources located on a search of his Japanese name, as well as both variants (given first, surname first) of the English translation of his name. No ja.wiki article to check for sources. Please see User_talk:Polbot#Nomination_of_Keizaburō_Saeki_for_deletion and scroll down/Ctrl+F PMC for the extensive number of AfDs that set a precedent for deleting 95% of these bot-generated stubs as entirely lacking sourcing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 21:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lechriodus

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Lechriodus indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Megaelosia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Megaelosia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:12, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race (talkcontribs) 09:52, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Shorea cara for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shorea cara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shorea cara until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Plantdrew (talk) 20:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bivinia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Bivinia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:58, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pepinia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Pepinia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nesoluma

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Nesoluma indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Biondia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Biondia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Metatrophis

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Metatrophis indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 03:13, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sarcostemma

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Sarcostemma indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Brownanthus

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Brownanthus indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:09, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Metalepis

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Metalepis indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:18, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lavrania

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Lavrania indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:56, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Maillardia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Maillardia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:58, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Neisosperma

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Neisosperma indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nothospondias

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Nothospondias indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Litosanthes

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Litosanthes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nargedia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Nargedia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:06, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Placopoda

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Placopoda indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:09, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tamridaea

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Tamridaea indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:18, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Stelechantha

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Stelechantha indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Antirhea

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Antirhea indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dendroseris

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Dendroseris indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Weberogobius

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Weberogobius indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 03:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

"California Laureate" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect California Laureate has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 10 § California Laureate until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Myioparus

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Myioparus indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 15:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. 'Baringo' for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. 'Baringo' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. 'Baringo' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race (talkcontribs) 16:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. 'Naivasha' for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. 'Naivasha' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. 'Naivasha' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race (talkcontribs) 16:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rapanea

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Rapanea indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 17:05, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Pyxicephalus cordofanus for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pyxicephalus cordofanus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyxicephalus cordofanus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Loopy30 (talk) 19:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rhacophorus depressus for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rhacophorus depressus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhacophorus depressus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Loopy30 (talk) 20:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Leandra

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Leandra indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 07:33, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pachyanthus

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Pachyanthus indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 21:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Clidemia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Clidemia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:04, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tetrazygia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Tetrazygia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Henriettella

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Henriettella indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:24, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pseudoeugenia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Pseudoeugenia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 17:54, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Calyptranthes

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Calyptranthes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 21:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Prince Jackson (disambiguation)

edit
 

The article Prince Jackson (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title and no other topics can be found within a reasonable time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Leptodea

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Leptodea indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:40, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Chaerephon (bat)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Chaerephon (bat) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:24, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Escobaria

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Escobaria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Paratilapia sp. nov. 'Lac Ihotry'

edit
 

The article Paratilapia sp. nov. 'Lac Ihotry' has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Undescribed species with article based on now deleted IUCN record. Undescribed species do not meet the rationale underlying WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plantdrew (talk) 22:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Paratilapia sp. nov. 'Vevembe'

edit
 

The article Paratilapia sp. nov. 'Vevembe' has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Undescribed species with article based on now deleted IUCN record. Undescribed species do not meet the rationale underlying WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plantdrew (talk) 22:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cauque

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Cauque indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:22, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Spathandra

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Spathandra indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 18:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nothobranchius aff. taeniopygus

edit
 

The article Nothobranchius aff. taeniopygus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Undescribed species with article based on now deleted IUCN record. Undescribed species do not meet the rationale underlying WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plantdrew (talk) 02:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pachypanchax sp. nov. 'Analava'

edit
 

The article Pachypanchax sp. nov. 'Analava' has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Undescribed species with article based on now deleted IUCN record. Undescribed species do not meet the rationale underlying WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plantdrew (talk) 02:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pachypanchax sp. nov. 'Sofia'

edit
 

The article Pachypanchax sp. nov. 'Sofia' has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Undescribed species with article based on now deleted IUCN record. Undescribed species do not meet the rationale underlying WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plantdrew (talk) 02:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Stygicola

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Stygicola indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Topobea

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Topobea indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lissonycteris

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Lissonycteris indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Enwebb (talk) 21:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Caecorhamdella

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Caecorhamdella indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 03:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Andrew Draper

edit

  Hello, Polbot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrew Draper, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sauropus

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Sauropus indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Genyorchis

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Genyorchis indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 14:54, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Aparasphenodon

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Aparasphenodon indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 00:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lithophila

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Lithophila indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of James Fry (writer)

edit
 

The article James Fry (writer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:AUTHOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Amphorella producta

edit
 

The article Amphorella producta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a non-valid taxon name. This species is not recognized as valid by MolluscaBase, the most authoritative source for molluscs, nor is it listed as a synonym. It has been deleted from IUCN and GBIF. Thus no major source recognizes it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Partula salifera

edit
 

The article Partula salifera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Erroneous corruption of Partula salifana which was finally removed from IUCN in IUCN 3.1. The associated Wikipedia page should therefore also be deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 0x16w (talk) 10:07, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Lutilodix has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Lutilodix has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NotAGenious (talk) 14:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rughidia

edit
 

The article Rughidia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unpublished taxon. See discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants#Rughidia

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Eddie Wilkins

edit
 

The article Eddie Wilkins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable RL player. Fails WP:SPORTBASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Alexteroon has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Alexteroon has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 00:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ataeniobius has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Ataeniobius has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Austromenidia has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Austromenidia has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Awalycaeus has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Awalycaeus has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 17:18, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Buffetia has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Buffetia has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Captaincookia has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Captaincookia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Corythaixoides has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Corythaixoides has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:53, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Crateroscelis has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Crateroscelis has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 02:09, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Durangonella has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Durangonella has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Holopogon has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Holopogon has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:20, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Polbot. Thank you for your work on Anaecypris. Another editor, Tavantius, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for making an article on Wikipedia! Have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tavantius}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tavantius (talk) 16:36, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply