Talk:House of Balloons / Glass Table Girls
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Pollosito in topic GA Review
![]() | House of Balloons / Glass Table Girls has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 7, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:House of Balloons / Glass Table Girls/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: AskeeaeWiki (talk · contribs) 22:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 17:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Hi, @AskeeaeWiki. I will be reviewing this article perhaps starting now (because today I'm going to my church's connection group, so my schedule is a little tight) to give you 2 GAs. Now I'm a little more confident in reviewing what happened in I Feel It Coming. Thank you for being so kind to me in the process. I assume you're sleeping for now, so I'll take the opportunity to put in as many observations as possible to speed up the process. Santi (talk) 17:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Infobox
edit- Since I realize that Trilogy is a compilation album, there is no need to mention it.
Background and production
edit- "As McKinney played the Weeknd instrumentals for consideration" => "As McKinney played songs to the Weeknd for consideration"
- Done
- Replace in ref 4 "cbc.ca" to "CBC". Wikilink.
- Link Billboard on ref 5.
- Done
- Add info about the song's inclusion on both album.
- Done
- "On November 13, 2012, it was reissued as a part of his compilation album, Trilogy." => "Afterwards, it was included on the Weeknd's compilation album, Trilogy, on November 13, 2012."
- Done
- Link compilation album.
- Done
Music and lyrics
edit- Reference 6 does not explicitly mention about a party. That's more what Billboard did.
- Done
- Move the ref 5 from "at the end" to "to sex."
- Done
- Move ref 1 from infobox to this section and complement the prose with it, which says that the song is alternative R&B. That source also needs authorship.
- Done
- Link Impact.
- Done
- Authorship for ref 8 (Daria Paterek)
- Done
Critical reception
edit- "Pitchfork later placed it on its list of top 100 songs of 2011 at #57, with Eric Grandy saying it was "Tesfaye at his best, emoting in a androgynous falsetto one minute, muttering unbelievable curses the next." " => "They later ranked it at number 57 on their list of Top 100 Songs, with Eric Grandy saying it was "Tesfaye at his best, emoting in a androgynous falsetto one minute, muttering unbelievable curses the next." " Since the name of the author of the first Pitchfork article is not mentioned in this article, this practice is acceptable.
- Done
- Change template to "cite magazine" in ref 7 and move "Rolling Stone" from "author1" to "magazine".
- Done
- "Rolling Stone declared "House of Balloons / Glass Table Girls" as the Weeknd's 9th best track, " => "ranked"
- Done
- "Rolling Stone placed the first part of the song at #488 on its 2021 and 2024 edition of the 500 best songs of all time." => "They also ranked its first part 488th on their 2021 revision of the 500 Greatest Songs of All Time." Move to the next paragraph.
- Done
- Problems with ref 12.
- Done
- "Complex further wrote" => "They further wrote"
- Done
- Reuse ref 13 after "melancholic R&B." and add authorship.
- Done
Live performances
edit- "The Weeknd performed the song for his first ever show in the United States." Is it another show or the Coachella one?
- It is the Coachella one, I cleared that up.
- Link "Billboard" in ref 15.
- Done
- Fix ref 21.
- Done
Personnel
edit- Modify the structure of the reference a little. "{{cite web|url=https://music.apple.com/us/song/house-of-balloons-glass-table-girls-original/1558942156|title=House of Balloons / Glass Table Girls (Original)|website=[[Apple Music]]|access-date=April 5, 2024}}" => "{{cite web |publisher=[[Apple Music]] |title=House of Balloons / Glass Table Girls (Original){{spaced ndash}}Song by The Weeknd |url=https://music.apple.com/us/song/house-of-balloons-glass-table-girls-original/1558942156 |access-date=April 7, 2024 |url-status=live}}" Can it be archived?
Certifications
edit- Passed.
- Delete "Notes" section.
Comments
edit- Believe me. There are times when my English listening becomes terrible. I say this because I listened to the Tom Power podcast episode referenced from the article, and I didn't hear the words "freestyle" and "demo", at least not explicitly. So, since you're a very honest editor, then I'll assume that part is fine. Santi (talk) 20:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- I will replace this, the Glass Table Girls demo is not mentioned and 25 minute-"House of Balloons" is not noted as a freestyle. 𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 20:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- OK. I'll make slight edits to the prose and approve the article at once. Santi (talk) 21:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @AskeeaeWiki: Before passing the article, I would like to know your opinion on the new summary of the article. We're practically done! Santi (talk) 23:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Pollosito All looks good! I see you're reviewing the article for "You're Losing Me", so good luck! I usually listen to the song while reviewing or expanding an article, it helped me a lot for both I Feel It Coming and Classy 101! You're a great reviewer, and I'm glad you're starting to become more confident! 𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 23:11, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Good job! Passed. Santi (talk) 23:12, 7 April 2024 (UTC)