Talk:Howell E. Jackson

Bot-created subpage

A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Howell Edmunds Jackson was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 01:48, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Howell Edmunds Jackson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070526175039/http://tennesseeencyclopedia.net/imagegallery.php?EntryID=J007 to http://tennesseeencyclopedia.net/imagegallery.php?EntryID=J007

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Howell Edmunds Jackson/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 05:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

• Hello Extraordinary Writ, I'll be taking up the review for this nomination and present it to you in some time. I hope my feedback will be helpful and that I can learn something new in the process. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 05:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

  Extraordinary Writ, I have completed the review and promoted the article. This is a very well researched and well sourced article, you have done excellent work on it. I've left a couple suggestions in the comments below but other than that I could not locate any other issues whatsoever. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 23:19, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

  Thanks for the review! I very much appreciate your comments, which I've addressed below. Cheers, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:47, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• "The elder Jackson" almost sounds like its referring to an older sibling, I would just suggest using the full name Alexander Jackson instead.

•  Done Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:47, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

• The lead says he authored about 50 opinions, it could just state that it was 46.

•  Done Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:47, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

• "While Jackson's opinion in Pollock kept him from total obscurity in the annals of history ..." This part in the last paragraph of the lead seems unnecessary. The second line in the lead is a more representative version of the same.

• I understand what you're saying, but I think it reads a bit more fluidly the way it is. It also emphasizes something separate that the sources find important: that Pollock rescued Jackson from "the shroud of anonymity". I hope you won't mind if I keep it as written. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:47, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Assessment

1. Comprehension: The article is well written.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	The prose is clear, concise and understandable.	Pass
(b) (MoS)	The article is complaint with the manual of style.	Pass

2. Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	The article has a list of references and in-line citations for all its contents in the body.	Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	Sources used are reliable.	Pass
(c) (original research)	No original research found.	Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	No plagiarism or copyright violations found.	Pass

3. Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive enough.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	The article broadly covers all major aspects.	Pass
(b) (focused)	The article remains on topic without unnecessary deviations.	Pass

4. Neutrality: The article is neutral.
Pass

Notes	Result
The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view.	Pass

5. Stability: The article is stable.
Pass

Notes	Result
No ongoing edit warring or content disputes present.	Pass

6. Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	Images are tagged with their appropriate copyright statuses.	Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	Use and captions are good.	Pass

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The C of E (talk) 15:20, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Howell Edmunds Jackson died of tuberculosis less than two and a half years after his appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court? Source: "...what gave every indication of a promising career on the Court was truncated by tuberculosis....he died–after less than two and one-half years of service on the bench...

• Reviewed: John H. Carkin

Improved to Good Article status by Extraordinary Writ (talk). Self-nominated at 23:59, 25 July 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Length fine, content within policy. Plagiarism detection turns up nothing. Fact verifiable from multiple sources. Nominated within 7 days of GA promotion. Blythwood (talk) 04:01, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Common name

Regarding the move of this page, Howell E. Jackson (53%), H. E. Jackson (24%), and Howell Jackson (22%) are the only iterations of Jackson's name that constitute over 5% of references to him on newspapers.com. Star Garnet (talk) 03:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC)