Talk:Hubli

Mangalore is larger and a more developed city than Hubli-Dharwad

Hubli is 2nd largest in Karnataka only in terms of population. Mangalore is much bigger than Hubli and combined Hubli-Dharwad in terms of Economy, International Airport, Major Seaport, Human Development Index, Education and Literacy Rate. Sorry to be blunt, but Hubli is just the centre of the backward North Karnataka region.106.217.93.13 (talk) 12:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Yes, agreed on all the points. Mangalore is larger even in terms of Banking and Real-estate. It is sad to know that some people are frequently vandalizing both the Mangalore and Hubli pages and don't understand the true facts. 2401:4900:49AF:E1BB:85A0:FF2C:BD7E:12F9 (talk) 03:08, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Mangalore might be more developed, but it isn't larger than Hubli-Dharwad. PareeKatti24 (talk) 19:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Hubli page is not adhering to Neutral point of view

There are several issues in the Hubli page where Neutrality is violated. 117.230.27.199 (talk) 16:58, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Why IT industries of Belgaum ??

This is a page for Hubballi. But I see IT industry listing of North Karnataka region. Also, There is Lot of Dharwad related information. Please have separate page for those different subjects. I will remove the content in another few days if nobody removes it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lokesh 2000 (talk • contribs) 14:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree with Mr Lokesh, there not much related information about Hubli, it should be there.

There should separate page for hubballi and dharwad,so that people can seperatly know about the cities.. Akshayklsd (talk) 07:24, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Hubballi dharwad is never a seperate...and hubballi is a Special IT economic zone park.. state government established IT PARK and Central government established Aryabhata IT park.. Sachin alagur (talk) 09:53, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Clean up Needed

The article has become a mess. several sections should go as separate articles but can have links from main article. for example IT industries of north karanataka, Historical regions in north karnataka, information about dharwad should be in their appropriate article. could anybody do the cleanup? I'm finding no time to do the cleanup.

Lokesh 2000 (talk) 04:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

definitely needs a thorough clean up --Crazysoul (talk) 07:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

The list of IT industries, colleges, real estate developers, etc, seems more like a reference list than a article. It is better to name one or two major companies and move the rest to sub-articles. Anyone with better knowledge of hubli area may take the initiative to do this and give a better shape to this article --Crazysoul (talk) 18:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Article improvement

I tried to cleanup messy things in the article but it is still horrible. I think we need to remove the list of IT industries and can add a paragraph describing the present IT scenario in the city. Also, Add more content to tourism section. We need to develop this in the same way as Bangalore article. Lokesh 2000 (talk) 08:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

SEO Links

There are many links which are no where connected with Hubballi. I guess links are listed for SEO purpose, not for public information. As Lokesh mentioned, it is mess and need serious cleanup. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phpses (talk • contribs) 13:07, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Help Review / Clean up

,m./n;l',

1. Personalities of Hubli/Hubbali
2. This page has to be specific to Hubballi or Hubli-Dharwad ?
3. References to commercial entities
4. Overall table of content

--Vinayak Kulkarni (Bangalore) (talk) 07:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Veeragase.jpg

The image Image:Veeragase.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:48, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Hubballi or Hubli?

This is to notify that Hubli hasn't yet been renamed Hubballi Yet.

Refer discussion at the page of Bangalore

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bangalore/Archive_4#Bangalore_or_Bengaluru.3F

Swaroop (talk) 06:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Hubballi Sachin alagur (talk) 09:49, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Requested Move 2010

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Propaniac (talk) 18:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

---

Hubballi → Hubli — Name change to Hubballi not yet approved by Government of India Discussion: Bangalore Also: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/4746303.cms Regards. Swaroop (talk) 17:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

• Support We are not governed on Wikipedia by what the Government of India (or any other government) decides, but by common use in English (in this case, as national varieties of English apply, in Indian English). A quick Google search in English, confined to sources in India, for Hubballi excluding Wikipedia and Hubli gives 257,000 hits; a search for Hubli excluding Hubballi and Wikipedia gives 19,900,000 hits. Confining that search to hits from the last year produces the same pattern. Clearly the common use is still Hubli. Skinsmoke (talk) 11:51, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
• Support No official name change. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:48, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
• Oppose That source quoted by nom is Jun 2009, so outdated. Uber crowds (talk) 12:20, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Added external link to Hubli - Dharwad City Guide

Request editors to review content on the website http://www.hubli-dharwad-city-guide.com. I myself own the website and hence it would be wise enough if the same is reviewed. If the website does not provide any additional value to Wikipedia visitors, then the same can be removed.

Thanks. Vishalkumarnjain (talk) 12:18, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

I don't really know the policies relating to this kind of external site stuff, but I guess we cannot review it. But personally, I think its a good start for a site, Regards. Swaroop (talk) 12:18, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Requested move 18 October 2014

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 18:54, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

---

Hubli → Hubballi – Government of India on 17-Oct-2014 cleared renaming 12 cities and towns of the Karnataka state, eight years after receiving a proposal from Karnataka government, Hubli as Hubballi. varma (talk) 11:40, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Oppose WP:COMMONNAME. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 19:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose obviously not the commonly recognised name. —innotata 22:48, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose. we should stick to WP:COMMONNAME. - Trinidade (talk) 08:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

- varma (talk) 11:40, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

== Hubli to Hubballi == Gandu metida nadu namma HUBBALLI

Change in name of Hubli to Hubballi need proper citation, Please add Government Gazette notification to validate this change.( !dea4u  06:44, 9 November 2014 (UTC))

References

Navagraha Jain Temple

I would be delighted if someone in Hubli takes a photograph of the Navagraha Jain Temple and uploads this onto Wikimedia Commons. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 23:26, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hubli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130613232521/http://stevens.usc.edu/pdf/hubli_dharwad.pdf to http://stevens.usc.edu/pdf/hubli_dharwad.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120420105843/http://www.hdmc.gov.in/cityprofile.php to http://hdmc.gov.in/cityprofile.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Combine Hubli/Hubballi article with Hubballi-Dharwad

Hi all,

We all know that the city of Hubballi and Dharwad were merged long back and now they are inseparable. Each and every aspect of the twin cities is collectively presented. Due to this it is very difficult to present good information of the twin cities separately. So I ask you all if we should combine these two cities and present them as one.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rggourav (talk • contribs) 15:31, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

yes please do combine both cities information.. Sachin alagur (talk) 09:54, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Stop mixing the contents of Hubli-Dharwad with Hubli page

Stop mixing the details of "Hubli-Dharwad" with the "Hubli" article. "Hubli" and "Dharwad" combined, form the 2nd largest city in terms of Area and Population in Karnataka. There is a separate Wikipedia page for "Hubli-Dharwad". Both Hubli and Dharwad are smaller than cities such as Mysore. Please have some common-sense while editing Encyclopedia articles.
2401:4900:16EC:402B:10CD:54C8:CE5:E015 (talk) 03:15, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

   Agree. I'll be cleaning up Hubli-Dharwad page in the coming week. PareeKatti24 (talk) 20:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Just for clarification, Hubli and Dharwad are not separate cities, the official name of the city is Hubli-Dharwad City not Hubli city and Dharwad city. Also, even if you somehow divide hubli and dharwad, Hubli alone will be larger than Mysore. What we should be doing is removing Hubli and Dharwad city pages and combine them in the Hubli Dharwad City page. That will present the correct and accurate information.

Requested move 20 August 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. No evidence provided by the nominator. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 15:53, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

---

Hubli → Hubballi – common name Anubhavklal (talk) 22:22, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

• Comment. The name was officially changed in 2014, so a Google news search was done for 1 January 2015 to 21 August 2023. This shows that both appear to be about equally popular in English-language news media: Hubli 245 in English Hubballi 241 in English.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:44, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

• Speedy close as not moved. The propose also started a move discussion at Talk:Hubli railway division#Requested move 21 August 2023 for the railway division named after the city. As with this discussion, the propose merely asserted that the common name is the name he/she chose. Wikipedia move discussions should be made on the basis of evidence. In addition, the names of the city and the railway division are linked. It would make more sense to have one discussion that covered all the Hubli/Hubballi articles that would be affected by a move discussion. So please can we close this discussion - and later have a new move discussion that meets these points. (And if the proposer presents no evidence for the move, to it speedy close it.) -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:55, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

  Agree on point that both articles need to be corrected. But I am not sure if they are to be linked together. It is absolutely ok if city name is different than the railway station name or the division name, if ghey are referred so in common use. Eg Lucknow Charbagh station is called so though city name is not Charbagh. Anubhavklal (talk) 08:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.