Talk:Hurricane! (American Dad!)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleHurricane! (American Dad!) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 4, 2011Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane!/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 01:20, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Will review soon. Ruby 2010/2013 01:20, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please use:   Done/ Not done

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit
  Done
  • "...in response to a oncoming hurricane." -> an
  Done
  Done
  • "The episode was well-received by television critics, who praised the humor and cultural references. " -> its
  Done
  • "This episode was written by..." -> "Hurricane!"
  Done
  • featured... featured (use of same word in lead; switch it up)
  Done
  • For the production section, you jump into the "crossover event" pretty abruptly. I know the lead already talks about it, but you need to write the body as if the lead isn't there (hope that makes sense)
  Done
  • Tense issue: ...event if this one receives successful ratings." -> received
  Done
  • Who is Mike Barker? A writer? Producer? For which series?
  Done
  • Make sure sentences with direct quotes end with a citation directly after sentence (Barker quote, look for others)
  Done
  • "In April 2011, the executives of the Fox Broadcasting Company..." Removed bolded
  Done
  • "MacFarlane later agreed with the decisions after being consulted with the executives of Fox, and a spokeswoman for the company later announced that the episode would air the succeeding season.[7]" Don't you mean MacFarlane consulted with the executives (rather than them consulting him)?
I'm not sure who came up to who first.
  • I think you should change casting to Writing and casting (b/c you mention the writers)
  Done I just organized the section into one.
  • "...first time Henry made a guest appearance on the show since" the show -> American Dad
  Done
  • Why do you have two different quote box colors?
  Done Removed other quote box.
  • Use consistent date formatting for refs
  Done
  • "...according to the Nielson ratings.[17]" Removed bolded
  Done
  • It could use another review or two for the reception section
  • "...Dyana Maria deemed the episode as "classic", expressing..." as -> a
  Done
  • Were there any cultural references you could add? (reliably cited of course)

I'll place the review on hold for a week while the above comments get addressed. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 02:59, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

The cultural references will not be reliable sourced, unfortunately. As for the reviews, those three were the only ones available. I can reformat it to make it look larger. - DAP388 (talk) 00:59, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Should be good now. :) - DAP388 (talk) 22:06, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Looks good. Happy to pass this one for GA. Ruby 2010/2013 23:00, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane! (American Dad!). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane! (American Dad!). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply