This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cuba, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cuba related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CubaWikipedia:WikiProject CubaTemplate:WikiProject CubaCuba articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The third paragraph of the lead states: "Ida is the sixth-costliest tropical cyclone on record, and the fourth-costliest Atlantic hurricane in the United States". The link to "sixth-costliest" is to List of costliest Atlantic hurricanes".
A hurricane, typhoon, and cyclone, ... are all the same thing: tropical storms. But they are known by different names in different locations..
Latest comment: 1 day ago7 comments4 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Excluding the lead (obvious reasons) and the background (summary of the tropical cyclone up to this point), the size of this article is only 34,406 bytes. For comparison, if the appropriate sections for Louisiana in Hurricane Ida were merged, it would be 49,864 bytes, and it doesn't have its own article. Each subsection in the impacts section is smaller than the corresponding subsections in Hurricane Ida, which means the size of the main article likely duplicates most, if not all of the information in this article and would have little to no expansion.
TL;DR: Article size is small-medium and the information is very likely duplicate of the main article, which would barely expand it. ZZZ'S10:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Weak Oppose the content in the sub article is actually completely different then the main article if read correctly. If all of it were to be merged, it would push 8,000 words. I want to see how it would work out if it was fully merged, since again the content is NOT duplicative, before supporting. 107.122.189.21 (talk) 13:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
After doing a little more research, I think it’s reasonable to say this article would fall in the 7,000-7,300 word range if the sub article is merged in, since again, most of the content is unique (the rainfall records, baseball game postponement, park closures and travel ban info is not in the main article), which is in line with SIZERULE, but would push it, and basically mean that we can’t expand the Ida article very much without having to spin it back out. 107.122.189.21 (talk) 20:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Neutral leaning support - you have to consider what a finished Ida article would look like. The preparations are clearly lacking. There isn't that much more info about the northeast that would be added, since that covers such a large area, and most of those areas are already mentioned here. If we run into the issue of size, I think Louisiana would be an appropriate sub-article in the future, given the damage there, and the much smaller scope. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Proposal to split Louisiana sections into a new article
Latest comment: 1 day ago7 comments3 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
I believe the Preparations, Impact, and Aftermath sections for Louisiana should be split into a new article. The current size is creeping very close to 160k bytes. The specific sections I mentioned, when combined, are almost 50k bytes in size, which is more than the Northeastern article (about 42k bytes). Doing the math, the main article should reduce in size and maybe leave room for the Northeastern articles to be merged. Considering it significantly affected the state, it sounds reasonable to split the content into a new section. ZZZ'S17:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support. Yea, I agree that there is overlap for the Northeast US effects article, and that splitting Louisiana would make sure this article doesn't get too long. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
