Talk:Hyde United F.C.

Hyde United F.C. was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 5, 2010	Good article nominee	Not listed
August 1, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Former good article nominee

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: England / English non-league Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the English non-league task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Greater Manchester Low‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors on April 28, 2011.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Fair use rationale for Image:Arms-hyde.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:Arms-hyde.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copyedit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A couple of comments following the recent copyedit: × Please clarify/cite according to the inline hatnotes.

Blogspot is not considered a reliable source unless the author is a noted individual published in other media.
Ａ　ｐｒｉｖａｔｅ　ｉｎｄｉｖｉｄｕａｌ　ｗｅｂｓｉｔｅ　ｈｏｓｔｅｄ　ｏｎ　ｂｔｉｎｔｅｒｎｅｔ．ｃｏｍ　ｉｓ　ｎｏｔ　considered a reliable source unless the author is a noted individual published in other media.
The term "purple patch" may not be understood by some Wikipedia readers - either link or replace. ► Philg88 ◄ ^talk 23:48, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hyde F.C./GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: NapHit (talk) 20:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Lead

Just as a general rule, there is no need to reference something in the lead if it is referenced later on. Also I would move the reference about the the nickname to the infobox

History

"26–0 beating at the hands of" not very encyclopaedic change to "26–0 by Preston"
"had topped it five times" again not great wording, I take it by topped it who mean won so I would change it to that.
"The first year back" change to "Their first season back in the League"
"The successful and much sought-after manager Mike McKenzie" this needs a reference as at the moment its POV.
"but remainded at the club" typo
"the Tigers got off to a sluggish start" change to "The Tigers started slowly
"during which they conceded only one home fixture." I think conceded should be changed to lost, sentence confused me when initially reading it.
Overall the section is good, but for a club with 125 years worth of history, I think the section leans towards recentism. I would like to see an expansion of the first section; two paragraphs covering nearly 100 years of history is not enough in my opinion.

Colours and crest

"This strip was used for the next two years until in 1887 Hyde's official colours" sentence doesn't make sense change to This strip was used for the next two years until 1887, when Hyde's official colours...
"In the club's first season," fairly sure the comma should a semi-colon

Ground

"Ewen Fields was made-over in summer 2010" not happy with made-over I would change the whole sentence to "The colour of the ground was changed from red to blue in 2010..."

References

Quite a few problems here: firstly the publisher is in italics in some places and not in others who need to be consistent.
There are a few book references but these don't give the publisher, the year published or the isbn. Look at the way the referencing for books is done in the Manchester United F.C. article and follow suit.
Any news sites used such as the Manchester Evening News need the date the story was published included and the author of the story (if there is one) included.
RSSF is actually RSSSF.

Apart from these concerns the article is in good shape. I'll put the article on hold until these issues are fixed and will gladly pass it once they are done. NapHit (talk) 20:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 19 May 2015

Latest comment: 9 years ago8 comments8 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. @Delusion23: Once this is done, you should request any related categories are renamed at WP:CFD under WP:C2D. You may also want to update the badge and make sure the rename is corrected elsewhere. Number 5 7 14:13, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hyde F.C. → Hyde United F.C. – The club has now reverted to its old name, effective immediately. Source: [1] Del_♉sion23 (talk) 20:37, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. BDD (talk) 16:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Support per nom. Giant Snowman 19:41, 20 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom. Mr Stephen (talk) 21:15, 20 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom. Fenix down (talk) 14:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom. Qed237 (talk) 14:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom. JMHamo (talk) 16:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Discrepancy

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The club was, according to the article, founded in 1919. It suffered its worst ever defeat in 1887. One of these dates must be wrong - or if not, some explanation is needed (e.g., is the club a phoenix club from an earlier team?). Grutness...wha? 11:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Since they became Hyde Utd for the second time, they have tried to downplay the first spell as Hyde FC. There is some bitterness among presumably a small and sometimes vocal group that exists about a time where they were rescued from bankruptcy and given a facilities upgrade and a ground makeover in exchange for a shirt sponsorship deal. 92.40.172.1 (talk) 18:36, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Hyde United F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Hyde United F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic