Talk:IGATE

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Actually, better to merge iGATE with iGATE Patni. I am going to do it now because it would create confusion among people who are trying to access iGATE and iGATE Patni. I hope this is approved.Adarsh Krishnaswamy 08:09, 22 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adkrish22290 (talkcontribs)

As Patni computers Systems was taken over by iGATE, so it is better to merge igate and patni in wiki. By Dhimant Kumar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.29.232.107 (talk) 05:43, 16 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

I hope it will be better to merge igate and patni in wiki

edit

I hope it will be better to merge igate and patni in wiki, as both of them integrated together, we can make sections in it as the history of patni and history of iGATE. --~~User:Dineshkumar_Ponnusamy~~ —Preceding undated comment added 10:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC).Reply

please combine igate and patni into one page i.e is iGATE

It is better to to merge iGate-PATNI page & Create separate section for iGate-PATNI in this page (IGATE)

Sasidatta (talk) 20:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

iGATE Corporation Strides Towards ‘One Company’

edit

With reference to the below page , which is officially published in 'iGATE' corporate website (effective from May 7, 2012), it is suggested to merge iGATE Patni page into iGATE page of Wiki. http://www.igate.com/press-release/2012/igate-corporation-strides-towards-one-company.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajkumarmpr (talkcontribs) 22:01, 25 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

IGATE

edit

I agree to merge Kendall rayanne (talk) 12:30, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-04-09/news/38404669_1_igate-immigration-laws-foreign-workers. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. GabrielF (talk) 08:15, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on IGATE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply