Kendall rayanne

Kendall rayanne (talk) 13:17, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Satya 2 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• film after 'Satya 2': RGV |publisher=Business Standard |date=2013-10-07 |accessdate=2013-11-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/movies/don-t-want-to-make-gangster-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:22, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ashok Vemuri, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dravidian and Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ram Gopal Varma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blockbuster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheAirplaneGuy (talk) 05:56, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Use the Talk page

There is a Talk page section on the hijacking claim and you should participate in that discussion instead of edit warring.--Brian Dell (talk) 05:57, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. I recommend you to stop this disruptive editing and see the talk page... TheAirplaneGuy (talk) 06:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Warning

Don't leave me fake warnings and quit the edit warring. Participate in the process instead of forcing your edits in. 107.10.35.75 (talk) 06:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TheAirplaneGuy (talk) 06:01, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

Why are you reverting back as opposed to discussing on the talk page? Citing a break in WP:3RR does not sustantiate the need to revert to a particular version. Samir 06:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

No more reversions please or I will block your account for your WP:3RR violation Samir 06:05, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Indeed, I noticed your "no time" excuse, KR so it's not like you don't know better. If you don't have the time to defend your editing, which as you can see many other editors object to, then you don't have time to edit war on Wikipedia and need to find something else to do. Please don't waste the time of others by requiring the initiation of the formal process of getting you blocked, KR. Not that it wouldn't be a very straightforward verdict in your case.--Brian Dell (talk) 06:07, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Blocked

Edit warring at the page above. 72 h because of zero meaningful communication and ongoing edit-warring despite being asked for clarification -- Samir 06:09, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ashok Vemuri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dravidian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ashok Vemuri

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ashok Vemuri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://companies.naukri.com/igate-jobs/executive-team/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GabrielF (talk) 16:35, 21 February 2015 (UTC)