Talk:I Am Unicorn/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (talk · contribs) 05:14, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Just one thingy: In critical reception, sentence His attempt to rescue the situation by reauditioning via performing a Romeo and Juliet scene with Rachel evoked laughter from the three directors and Rachel herself, but as Votta points out, Kurt was "not actually being bad as Romeo"; even Jayma Mays, who plays Emma, one of the directors in that scene, thought Kurt was "good".

• It reads as if Mays' critique of Kurt was associated with Votta's review. Maybe clarify :) Rcej (Robert) – talk 05:16, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

• Done. Thanks for the catch. I've separated the two sentences, added a bit more to Mays, and not referenced the Votta story after the Mays quote. Does it work now? BlueMoonset (talk) 06:08, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

• Kewl! Rcej (Robert) – talk 09:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

The article I Am Unicorn passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass