Talk:I Think I Love It

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review
Good articleI Think I Love It has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 11, 2019Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:I Think I Love It/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kyle Peake (talk · contribs) 16:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Infobox and lead

edit
  • Move the video from links to infobox
  • "is a song recorded by Romanian" → "is a song by Romanian"
  • "digitally released by" → "digitally released through" as there is currently two many close uses of "by"
  • "while production was handled" → "while the production was handled"
  • "track, "I Think I Love It" lyrically discusses" → "track, the song's lyrics discuss"
  • Remove sentence about praise as it's literally only one critic
  • "An accompanying music video..." start a new para at this sentence
  • "directed by Criss Blaziny in Constanța." → "directed by Criss Blaziny." as the location is not notable enough for lead
  • "Making use of several explicit imagery" this reads awkwardly due to no plural, reword
  Done everything apart from the new para suggestion. Paragraphs look really ugly if they're only two or three-line, and that's the case here. I thin it's alright the way it is now.

Background and composition

edit
  • Add a sentence about the chart performance after the one about release
This doesn't really fit in here. I think for such articles with really short length, it's alright to only mention one single peak in the lead and in its own "Charts" section.
  • "Alexandra Stan had previously" → "Prior to release, Stan had" as you should only use her full name in the lead and remove WikiLink
  • ""I Think I Love It" served as" → "The song served as"
  • Target Mixing (audio) to Audio mixing (recorded music)
  • "as well as "remind us..." → "as well as reminding "us..." since the latter has correct grammar
  Done

Music video and promotion

edit
  • "Stan's YouTube channel" → "Stan's official YouTube channel" as you often refer to them as in articles
  • "Romania and features the guest appearance of" → "Romania, and features a guest appearance from"
  • Is the model's country of birth known?
She's probably Romanian, but the source doesn't say it.
  • "Stan—topless underneath" → "Stan topless underneath"
  • "cowboy boots—and Olaru" → "cowboy boots, alongside Olaru"
  • "and to pose in" → "and pose in"
  • "Stan is seen sporting" → "Stan can be seen sporting"
  • Target LED to Light-emitting diode
  • "another large board patterned with bananas and LED border lights in the clip's" → "another large board, patterned with bananas and LED border lights, in the clip's"
  • "Closing the video are" → "The video closes out with"
  • "and noted" → "while he also noted"
  • "Stan also posted" is the word also really needed as it doesn't say that someone else posted first?
  • ""impress[ed] to no end, [...] giving..." → ""impress[ed] to no end", describing her as "giving..."
  • "the singer sang for" → "the singer sang the song for"
  • "Stan has further appeared" → "Stan made further appearances"
  Done

Credits and personnel

edit
  • Good

Track listing

edit
  • Good

Charts

edit
  • Good

Release history

edit
  • Territory → Country
  • Add ref to own column
  Done

References

edit
  • Archive these with the tool
  • Change refs 9 and 15 to citing website
  • Remove WikiLink to YouTube on refs 10, 12, 13 and 14
  Done

Final comments and verdict

edit
  •   On hold for now. Good job on this, just a number of fixes and you're done!
@Kyle Peake: I responded to your comments. Thanks for the review!   Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:15, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
 Pass sorry I forgot about this! --Kyle Peake (talk) 11:16, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply