Talk:Iejima
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
editIejima is the correct romanization of the island[1]. This should be at Iejima, which, for some reason, is a redirect here Nik42 06:53, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- Next time, please go to WP:RM directly, this could have been done 6 months ago! --Mkill 00:29, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Please list below your opinion on this proposed move. Be sure to sign your post with ~~~~
- Support per nom. --日本穣 Nihonjoe 00:50, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- ISN'T AN ARTIFACT SOMETHING MAN-MADE? ARTICLE SAYS "EROSION ARTIFACT." — Preceding unsigned comment added by JL28552855 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Island in Infobox map
editThe island in the Infobox map is Okinawa: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Okinawa+Prefecture,+Japan/@26.5849961,127.7173526,9z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x34f57062eeab5be7:0x35bb617286fdd1ef?hl=en
Iejhima is a small, peanut-shaped body of land lying just off the SE coast of Okinawa. Contrast its appearance (and location) here: https://www.google.com/maps/@26.7219407,127.7901551,14z?hl=en.
Please feel free to insert a map of Iejima in place of that currently used of the Okinawan archipelago among the Ryukyu Islands. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 23:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- For one, the map is of Japan, not "the Okinawa archipelago among the Ryukyu Islands". Second, the blip indicating Iejima is distinctively to the West of Okinawa Island. The map is not a map of Iejima, but of Iejima's location within Japan. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 23:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- The locator map used is all but useless, causing more confusion than any clarity it can imbue. Iejima isn't visible whatsoever. All that's given is an oversized dot in the insert, which someone would need a solid knowledge of Japan and the Ryukyu Islands to identify as being of a scattering of small islands that could not fit in the bottom left of the main map. Iejima wouldn't even be the size of a period on it. The single word caption "Iejima" leads the reader to errantly imagine that's what they are looking at.
- To resolve this and head off any edit warring I have inserted a map in the body of the article clearly showing the size, shape, and location of Iejima relative to Okinawa (which is what Iejima and its location is relevant to, the battle to control Okinawa in World War II. I've also clarified the caption to the locator map in the Infobox. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 03:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- That works for me, however "Okinawan archipelago" is a little confusing, because of the scale of the map. Either you mean the Ryukyu Islands or the Okinawa Islands, but because it's difficult to see Iejima amongst its neighbors, I changed the wording to "Okinawa Islands" with a wikilink. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 05:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Fine. A Solomonic compromise (given the region's geographic complexity). All good. Wikiuser100 (talk) 12:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Iejima. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070825113418/http://rekishi.jkn21.com/ to http://rekishi.jkn21.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- --- ***
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC)