Talk:Inchconnachan
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is this article Wallaby-heavy?
editThere must be more to the history of Inchconnachan than the story of Lady Colquhoun and her wallabies, but 93% (I checked) of this article is about wallabies, with a third of the article being a direct quotation from one man offering opinions rather than facts. As well as more information on size, grid coordinates, archaeology and history, we could probably have considerably less about wallabies. The island's name suggests an interesting historical association with Clan Colquhoun, which could be explained. If no one has any objections, I propose a wallaby cull on my next visit to the Inchconnachan article. Thor Ewing (talk) 15:11, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Inchconnachan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090710015304/http://lochlomond-islands.com/ to http://www.lochlomond-islands.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080921112627/http://www.incallander.co.uk/islands.htm to http://www.incallander.co.uk/islands.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)