Talk:India (East Syriac ecclesiastical province)

East Syrian Metropolitan Archeparchy of India (Angamaly)

East Syrian Ecclesiastical Province of India was called the Metropolitan Archeparchy of India with its seat at Angamaly. Please change the article name to this as it explains the topic better. Achayan (talk) 13:21, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

I disagree, for a few reasons. First, "ecclesiastical province" is much more recognizable as a title than "Metropolitan Archeparchy". I can't even find any references to India as a "Metropolitan Eparchy" online. In fact, the sources I had used the term "Province". Second, the parentheses is only used for disambiguation, so the addition of "(Angamaly)" is redundant.--Cúchullain ^t/c 13:29, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned references in India (East Syriac ecclesiastical province)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of India (East Syriac ecclesiastical province)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "thehindu.com":

• From Kerala: "Symbols akin to Indus valley culture discovered in Kerala". The Hindu. Chennai, India. 29 September 2009.
• From Abraham of Angamaly: "Tomb of State's last Persian Chaldean bishop discovered". The Hindu. 20 September 2015. Retrieved 4 October 2018.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:48, 10 July 2022 (UTC)