Talk:India (actress)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the India (actress) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Assessment (and short review)
edit- No references at all, for someone as inherently controversial as a porn star, we absolutely need Wikipedia:Reliable source references. IMDB and IAFD don't count, as they're anonymous contribution databases, with minimal editorial control. Can't see marking higher than {{Start-Class}} without them, and, in fact, controversial entries could just get deleted without them. Is there a publicly available bio on her web site? That can be used.
- She appeared with some notable music stars, and put out a mainstream album, so the importance scale could go to {{Mid-importance}} if a reference shows that the greater world outside porn noticed.
- Filmography section is too long. Keep the first entry, and the Snoop Dogg ones that have articles, but other than those, just keep a few (half dozen, say) representative ones. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pornography#Filmographies --AnonEMouse (squeak) 17:45, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Problems
editThe article claims India to publish stuff via karadavis.com, as well as working for the moonlite bunny ranch. there seems to be absolutely no India material at karadavis.com. Is that sentence a cleverly disguised advertising ? Same goes for the brothel, though that web site is not too conclusive. If nobody offers some hints or sources I will remove that sentence Tullius2 22:26, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 22:28, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
India (entertainer) → India (pornographic actress) – Restore prior 1 December 2011 moved India (pornographic actress) to India (entertainer)) per consistency with category and main notability, compare RM Talk:Eve (entertainer). In ictu oculi (talk) 16:01, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support. Pornographic actress is far more informative than entertainer, if we're going to disambiguate we may as well make it useful. Zarcadia (talk) 22:24, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
(actress)/(pornographic actress) RfC
editAn RfC which may affect this article's title is currently taking place (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography#RfC: Should a person who has appeared in exclusively pornographic films be described as "(actor/-tress)" or "(pornographic actor/-tress)"?). Rebecca1990 (talk) 07:13, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on India (actress). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110902083010/http://www.urbanxawards.com:80/urbanxongoing/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=52&Itemid=66 to http://www.urbanxawards.com/urbanxongoing/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=52&Itemid=66
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)