Talk:Indian People's Congress

Untitled

• This article makes a statement of fact. How does the question of 'higher standard' in the context come in? Let the person who tagged it 'needs cleanup' tell the reason. Moreover, wikipedia is not compiled exclusively in 'US English'. There are many forms of spoken and written English current in different countries, including India, and all are of equal standard. We ask for the third party expert opinion on the subject.

• Very stubby. No information on how important, large or successful it is. (All it has is the year it was oficially created and the quote of its charter). RJFJR 18:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

473 googles, 12 distinct, a lot from wikipedia and mirrors. Either I'm not searching wide enough or we have a notability problem here. RJFJR 18:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

• Agree with RJFJR, very stubby. I'm going to finish the cleanup of this article and delete the charter information (WP:NOT). The article should describe the impact the party has had in past elections and politics, significant candidates within the party, etc. -Barkeep 14:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)