Talk:Indian labour law

Fragment

The introductory sentence "Traditionally, Indian governments at federal and state level have sought to ensure a high degree of protection for workers, but in practice, form of government and because labour is a subject in the concurrent list of the Indian Constitution," is an inocmplent sentence fragment. It is not clear what the Wikipedian was looking to say here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.9.75.193 (talk) 15:17, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Neutrality

This article needs rewritten to give information on Indian Labour Laws, rather than to bemoan their existence! Parslad (talk) 19:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2010-06-21/news/27567416_1_capita-income-labour-market-demographic-dividend. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MER-C 13:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Additions

I've done some initial work here on improving the page's framework. There's plenty of sources for Indian labour law, and information on it. Sadly, there is quite a charged debate on labour law's existence (though it seems mostly focused on government approval being needed for dismissals). If anyone can add information and especially if they can create case pages, this would be excellent to see. Wikidea 20:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Link citation

Many of the citations go to some variant of 'page not found'. As I know very little about the issue, I politely request that either links that do work be provided, or the page get edited to remove the necessity for the links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.200.182.198 (talk) 08:59, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Indian labour law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150421055739/http://pblabour.gov.in:80/pdf/acts_rules/trade_unions_act_1926.pdf to http://pblabour.gov.in/pdf/acts_rules/trade_unions_act_1926.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.southasiaexperts.se/pdf/Indian%20Labour%20Law%20PDF.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606112149/http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/52/39452196.pdf to http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/52/39452196.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indian labour law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090307101534/http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20060701faessay85401-p0/gurcharan-das/the-india-model.html to http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20060701faessay85401-p0/gurcharan-das/the-india-model.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Indian labour law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120131102706/http://labour.nic.in/annrep/annrep0304/english/chapter06.pdf to http://labour.nic.in/annrep/annrep0304/english/chapter06.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121021115053/http://epfindia.nic.in/EPFAct1952.pdf to http://epfindia.nic.in/EPFAct1952.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120809084340/http://www.ilo.org/legacy/english/regions/asro/newdelhi/ipec/responses/india/national.htm to http://www.ilo.org/legacy/english/regions/asro/newdelhi/ipec/responses/india/national.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ccsindia.org/interns2006/How%20Wrong%20is%20left%20about%20ecoonimic%20reforms%20in%20India%20-%20Aditya.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120119084332/http://www.nac.nic.in/pdf/child_labour.pdf to http://www.nac.nic.in/pdf/child_labour.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130511121431/http://www.econ.yale.edu/seminars/develop/tdw09/adhvaryu-091207.pdf to http://www.econ.yale.edu/seminars/develop/tdw09/adhvaryu-091207.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Employment

Employee 2401:4900:22B2:7B9F:1528:3EB8:12C3:8B80 (talk) 15:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)