Talk:InterContinental New York Barclay Hotel

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on InterContinental New York Barclay Hotel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101012173946/http://www.nysonglines.com:80/lexington.htm to http://www.nysonglines.com/lexington.htm/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 16:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

[[File:|140px|InterContinental New York Barclay ]]

InterContinental New York Barclay

• ... that New York City's Barclay Hotel had a bird cage in the center of its lobby? Source: "Lap of Luxury: InterContinental New York Barclay". FOX 5 New York. February 6, 2017
  • ALT1: ... that at New York City's Barclay Hotel, visitors often met at a bird cage in the center of its lobby? Source: "Manhattan 'railroad hotel' The Barclay gets reno honouring its history". thestar.com. September 10, 2016.
  • ALT2: ... that actor John Gielgud's first television advertisement was for New York City's Barclay Hotel? Source: "Advertising; Campaign On Hotel Face Lift". The New York Times.
  • ALT3: ... that advertisements for New York City's Barclay Hotel featured John Gielgud and a bird cage? Source: "Advertising; Campaign On Hotel Face Lift". The New York Times.
  • ALT4: ... that the wine cellar of New York City's Barclay Hotel was installed on the second floor because there were railroad tracks in the basement? Source: Fabricant, Florence (November 28, 1984). "Restaurant Wine 'cellars': Some Untraditional Locations". The New York Times.
  • ALT5: ... that the wine cellar of New York City's Barclay Hotel is on the second floor? Source: Fabricant, Florence (November 28, 1984). "Restaurant Wine 'cellars': Some Untraditional Locations". The New York Times.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/KXGN-TV

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 16:57, 9 January 2023 (UTC).

• The article is expanded fivefolds, long enough, referenced, neutral and no copyvio obvious. The hooks are sourced and interesting. AGF several offline sources in the article. The image here is free and clear, while other images in the article are also free. Just waiting for QPQ and other possible hooks. Corachow (talk) 19:45, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

• Pinging Epicgenius. Sorry, should've done it in the review. Corachow (talk) 13:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

• @Corachow: Thanks for the review, and it's my fault that I didn't see this earlier. I'll do a QPQ soon and, if I have time, propose additional hooks. Epicgenius (talk) 16:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

• @Corachow: I have now done a QPQ. Sadly, I can't think of any other interesting hooks (I thought I could think of a hook related to the bird cage, but it seems not). Thank you again for the review. Epicgenius (talk) 15:11, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

• Thanks, approving now. Corachow (talk) 15:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:InterContinental New York Barclay Hotel/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Argenti Aertheri (talk · contribs) 02:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Review last updated at: 05:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	There were a couple minor issues but I took care of them
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Congrats!

Notes for if you want to improve it further:

• If you want to make the separation between the maps clearer, include this in the image code: | image_style = border-color: gray;
• Images of the interior might be a nice touch
• Facade should probably be façade, per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Foreign_terms

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.