Talk:Interview with the Assassin

Fair use rationale for Image:Interviewwiththeassassindvdcover.jpg

Image:Interviewwiththeassassindvdcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

correctly classified?

This film is presented in a pure documentary style, a fake with no disclaimers other than that implied by credit to writers and cast. There are no comedic elements. In my opinion, a mockumentary is a comedic false documentary: a parody or satire in documentary style, such as This is Spinal Tap, Best in Show, or The Life and Hard Times of Guy Terrifico. Why wouldn't this movie be better described as a fictional documentary-style suspense film? — Mark (Mkmcconn) ** 20:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Your classification is correct Shii (tock) 05:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)