Talk:Investigation of a Flame
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Cawhee in topic Previous proposal for deletion
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Investigation of a Flame article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wikiproject Film
|
---|
Previous proposal for deletion
editThis page was proposed for deletion by Cawhee (talk · contribs) on 7 January 2013 with the comment: It has been six years since the article's submission and did not meet wikistandards at creation. In 2009 the article received an inline citations tag that has been ignored. A large number of the reference links are dead and because the references do not use in-line citations it is impossible to see whether they were of importance to the article or not. It was contested by Arxiloxos (talk · contribs) on 04:24, 7 January 2013 with the comment: GNews shows multiple reviews, has won awards, not suitable for PROD. |
Discussion
editI would like to thank Arxiloxos for fixing the problems I highlighted. I would ask if this article was worth saving, however apparently to users such as Arxiloxos, it is. Thank you so much for taking the time out of your day to generate in-line citations and congratulations on saving an article from proposed deletiion that I see you care for. Seeing that much more work has gone into the article, I expect more bold edits going into this article in the future. I will note that I am keeping an eye on this article and will ensure that it receives the attention it apparently deserves.
Best regards,
--Cawhee (talk) 21:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)