 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Iran–Pakistan trade relations page were merged into Iran–Pakistan relations. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Pre-Partition links
editThis article focuses everything on its links to Iran following its creation in 1947. I thought I'd write a bit, discussing the regions historic geographic links. It probably needs a rewrite, but I hope it served as a good starter. Afghan Historian 23:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Iran was created in 1935, not 1947.Vmrgrsergr 15:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Note: The analysis is rather skim, and portrays Pakistan-Iran relations from a ethno-cultural viewpoint, which results in the positive bias. For one, since the Islamic revolution in Iran, relations with Pakistan soured due to Saudi Arabia's active role in building a "Sunni Wall" around Shia Iran by direct funding of Madrassas in Pakistan, an act viewed by the Islamic Republic as regional aggression on behalf of both countries.
March 8th 2008
Updated page to remove ethno-cultural bias. Re-organized content to make it more readable.
Sources and references still need to be updated.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.24.117.226 (talk) 11:58, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
June 6th 2008
Changed intro to bring linguistic ties into prominence. Will also be deleting comment on Iran's oil-funded intellligence being used to "support" Shiite groups in Pakistan as North American propoganda as there is no source listed. 99.237.58.114 (talk) 06:41, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Bias
editThere are numerous biased views in the article unsupported by facts and reliable sources. I do not have time right now but will come back to clean up the article. Did some work at the bottom of it though. The article is trying to portray Iran as evil Shia and Pakistan as sunni angel. The truth is that there is no evil/angel stuff between the nations. For example there is no evidence of any Shia militancy in Pakistan neither any Shia terrorism in Pakistan, all forms of terrorism in Pakistan are exclusive domain of wahabi sect. Trying to pull Iran into this is just a speculative and not encyclopedic. Not even a single Pakistani has been killed in Iran or injured but dozens of Iranians have been killed in Pakistan just because they were Iranians. Iran has been very patient ofcourse on the whole issue but it does not mean, it did not happen.--Irooniqermez (talk) 03:35, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Can you state the sources for Iranians being persecuted in Pakistan or Pakistan attacking iranian targets? Also there's no indication of Pakistan being portrayed as the "sunni angel?"-99.226.203.145 (talk) 23:21, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
this article is heavily biased for iran Mynamz (talk) 13:37, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
This article is a mess and full of nationalistic claims without proper claims/sources
editThis article really needs an overhaul. It's full of unsupported claims, bad sources (alot of wich are used directly from britannica) and mostly alot of (Pakistani?) nationalism. LouisAragon (talk) 17:08, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I've removed some dubious claims with vague or not reliable sources. More reliable sources on relationship would be good. LouisAragon (talk) 18:11, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- Absolutely agree with you. This article is poorly written and full of bogus made-up history and presents only a wishful Pakistani POV. No Iranian account is provided. Will email Iranian editors and other experts on Iranian foreign relations and Iranian history to balance out this entry with actual facts and nullify the bogus information and POV currently infectious throughout the entire article. 92.4.161.52 (talk) 12:28, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
After reading this article again, I agree it's indeed a wishful Pakistani's POV written piece. Full of anachronisms (f.e Relations between the IR of Iran and Pakistan have spanned since millenia....), unsupported claims, bias, and mostly what seems as some kind of inferiority complexion. (?) This article still needs a big overhaul. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.210.203.230 (talk) 19:31, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Recent developments?
editThe recent border incidents involving border guards firing at each other including the death of a Pakistani ranger and the cancellation of the Pak-Iran pipeline should be touched upon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.97.79.208 (talk) 01:41, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Iran–Pakistan relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090408063452/http://www.iran-daily.com:80/1388/3366/html/economy.htm to http://www.iran-daily.com/1388/3366/html/economy.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:54, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Iran–Pakistan relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130227064341/http://articles.cnn.com/2002-12-24/world/pakistan.khatami_1_kashmir-dispute-kashmiris-on-both-sides-zafarullah-khan-jamali?_s=PM%3Aasiapcf to http://articles.cnn.com/2002-12-24/world/pakistan.khatami_1_kashmir-dispute-kashmiris-on-both-sides-zafarullah-khan-jamali?_s=PM%3Aasiapcf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050518095538/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_16-10-2003_pg7_12 to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_16-10-2003_pg7_12
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Iran–Pakistan relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130410121859/http://www.iranembassy.pk/en/political-section/592-pak-iran-relations-since-islamic-revolution-genisis-of-cooperatio-and-competition.html to http://www.iranembassy.pk/en/political-section/592-pak-iran-relations-since-islamic-revolution-genisis-of-cooperatio-and-competition.html
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130419071118/http://www.geo.tv/GeoDetail.aspx?ID=42475 to http://www.geo.tv/GeoDetail.aspx?ID=42475
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080216052138/http://www.aspr.ac.at/epu/research/rp_0807.pdf to http://www.aspr.ac.at/epu/research/rp_0807.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131030071936/http://www.vijbooks.com/book/164/Dr-Satyanarayan-Pattanayak/Iran-s-Relations-with-Pakistan-A-Strategic-Analysis/9789380177656.html to http://www.vijbooks.com/book/164/Dr-Satyanarayan-Pattanayak/Iran-s-Relations-with-Pakistan-A-Strategic-Analysis/9789380177656.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 16 November 2017 (UTC)