Talk:Isuzu D-Max

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 93.147.251.157 in topic COPYVIOL

Chevrolet D-Max image

edit

Please don´t take the Chevrolet D-Max picture [DMax © GM Corp.jpg] away from the article again. It´s use is accepted by GM for non-commercial objectives, and has licensed this image under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. You can see that following this link: http://gm.wieck.com/forms/gm/*query?CLdmax&source=all From the link: Las imágenes de GM que aparecen en este sitio Web están protegidas por derechos de autor y una licencia Creative Commons 3.0. Las mismas son proporcionadas a los medios de comunicación sólo a los efectos de comentarios editoriales. Queda prohibido el uso se estas imágenes para fines publicitarios, de mercadeo u otros objetivos comerciales. Las imágenes pueden recortarse, pero no pueden alterarse de ninguna otra manera, y cada una debe portar la identificación de crédito "© GM Corp." General Motors no eleva protestas con respecto al consentimiento de aquellas personas que aparecen en estas fotos, ni en relación con el uso de nombres, marcas comerciales, imágenes comerciales, diseños, creaciones u obras de arte o de arquitectura que estén protegidos por derechos de autor y que no sean propiedad intelectual de General Motors. General Motors has licensed [DMax © GM Corp.jpg] under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Viva Chile (talk) 19:03, 21 March 2008 (UTC)(talk) 15:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

See Commons:Bad sources. OSX (talkcontributions) 12:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

V6 engines not listed ?!

edit

On the right hand side, why is the 3.6 V6 not listed under 'engines' ? Davez621 (talk) 14:52, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

why not add the 3.8 V6 yourself, if you care so much about it? Sennen goroshi (talk) 03:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

cositer lusuzu

edit

je veux aitre fornisseure poure votre cositer a tunis j'ai un locale la bas . et je veux savoire la metodede prener des aunettes "d_mas"et en ouvre un point de vente en tunise sous le nom de ma cosieter. svp donner mois toutes les ronseniemment. contcacter moi sur men mail "titos19811@hotmail.com" mes filissitation avous et mercie —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.96.110.249 (talk) 00:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Number of productions

edit

Thai Isuzu claimed more than 1,000,000 D-Maxs built and sold in Thailand. [1](in Thai) --Love Krittaya (talk) 15:12, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Second Generation

edit

In September 2011, the second generation of D-Max was released in Thailand.

--125.25.192.126 (talk) 08:15, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes.

Now, some IP addresses was wrote about it.

--Love Krittaya (talk) 02:00, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Merger Proposal

edit

I, VX1NG propose that the Chevrolet Colorado/GMC Canyon/Isuzu i-Series be merged into the Isuzu D-Max article. Regards, VX1NG (talk) 12:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Support: although it would be a big job, I support a merger of the two. I get the impression that Isuzu did most of the design for both generations, albeit using GM platforms. The original series was released as an Isuzu in 2002, GM did not start producing the North American models until 2004. It should be noted, the USA models share very few parts:

Originally planned as a joint venture with Isuzu, and sharing some common architecture with Isuzu's D-Max pickup, the Shreveport-built Colorado-and its stablemate, the GMC Canyon-has morphed through the R&D stages into its own unique entity. The only parts the new Chevy shares with the D-Max are the transfer case and dash-mounted 4WD pushbutton panel. (The D-Max, built in Thailand, isn't offered for sale in North America.) — Four Wheeler

For the second generation Chevy Colorado, General Motors do Brasil did the GM-isation of the D-Max for Asia and South America [2].
Therefore, I propose Isuzu D-Max as the head article, which would encompass:
  • First generation:
    • Chevrolet Colorado (Asian/South American version; a rebadged D-Max)
    • Chevrolet Colorado (North American version; a derivative of D-Max that appears to be almost identical but enlarged in size—has otherwise the same appearance, doors, body, interior)
    • GMC Canyon (North American version; a rebadged Chevrolet Colorado)
    • Isuzu i-Series (North American version; a rebadged Chevrolet Colorado)
    • Isuzu MU7 (Asian/South American SUV version; a wagon version of the pickup)
  • Second generation:
    • Chevrolet Colorado (Asian/South American version; a rebadged D-Max with different front and rear styling)
    • Chevrolet Colorado (North American version; a derivative of the Asian/South American Colorado that has revised front styling and a new interior)
    • GMC Canyon (North American version; a rebadged Chevrolet Colorado)
    • Isuzu MU-X (Asian/South American SUV version; a wagon version of the pickup)
    • Chevrolet TrailBlazer (Asian/South American SUV version; a wagon version of the pickup)
OSX (talkcontributions) 12:27, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
While I don't doubt that such a merger would be justifiable, I simply don't see the purpose of executing it. It would cause a lot of consternation but for what benefit?  Mr.choppers | ✎  23:40, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
For the same reason the previous generations of Isuzu-based Chevrolet pickups are all centrally located at Isuzu Faster. The USA pickups are Americanised, the Asian SUVs are even more closely related being a mere change in body style. OSX (talkcontributions) 10:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
My first reaction is to oppose it, due to the fairly substantial differences of the North American market version. However, the Asian "overlap" model certainly does confuse matters, providing a link of sorts. My gut instinct is still to leave things largely as they are, with appropriate links and explanations. I just feel that our energy can be better spent.  Mr.choppers | ✎  23:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

I oppose such a merger. There's room for each market to be represented independently. Just provide links & a brief explanation of the bloodline. Ultimately, this decision should be made with the average reader in mind. Other than a reference, the average guy in Texas who searched "Chevy Colorado" doesn't care about mid-year bumper alterations & resulting engine changes to a compact Isuzu diesel truck sold in Thailand. He wants a concise technical summary comprised of broad based facts specific to the Chevy Colorado. Similar to what one would find in an encyclopedia. I'd support the idea of a page like "Worldwide Variations of GM/Isuzu GMT355 Truck Platform" in which all models are chronicled. Lets keep it in perspective, no one wants to merge the Tangerine & Orange wikis because they're both orange Citrus Fruits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JustinLoyalWoodall (talkcontribs) 08:26, 14 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I own a GMC Canyon and wouldn't have known to search for the Isuzu, nor would I care about the Isuzu if I were to search for GMC Canyon. 2601:8:AC01:650:FD21:F71C:F002:1A0F (talk) 04:44, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
I emphatically oppose a merger of pages. As mentioned above, there may be similarities, but the pickup by this name (Colorado) is very much a "thing" in North America. I don't think Isuzu even did any of the major legwork on design. They've been rebadging GM trucks for years in the US Market anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CapitalTruck (talkcontribs) 02:02, 7 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Second generation connection to Colorado?

edit

As with previous models, the 2012 Isuzu Dmax shares its ladder chassis platform, body construction, mechanical componentry and interior design (dash, centre stack, steering wheel and doors) with the upcoming 2013 North American Chevrolet Colorado. From A-pillar on back Isuzu Dmax appears to be a clone of Chevy Colorado but gets its own visual identity due to an aggressive angular front fascia with upswept headlights and a more conventional grille design.[15]

Firstly, the interior design of the two cars are completely different. Secondly, the link being referenced is dead, so there is no way to prove the ties between D-Max and the Colorado.

Looking at Colorado and D-Max, it appears that nothing except looking similar behind the B-pillar is common between the two cars. (Except maybe the chassis). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brokentrak (talkcontribs) 19:50, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Isuzu D-Max. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:02, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Great Wall and Foday

edit

This comment appeared on my user talk page:

Hi: the D-Max isn't related with the Great Wall and Foday pick-up, the chinese pick-up are based on the old Isuzu Faster, and are only a copy of the design of the D-Max.
— User:62.98.104.226 15:09, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

/Boivie (talk) 07:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

COPYVIOL

edit

http://thailand-dealer.com/2012-isuzu-dmax.html Text about second generation are a copy of this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.147.251.157 (talk) 10:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply