 | Ivo Herenčić has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 11, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that World War II war criminal Ivo Herenčić worked as an art-seller in Rome after the war? | ||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
April 1941
editThe final part of the first paragraph of the World War II section is a bit unclear. Presently it reads:
On 11 April, while the invasion was still underway, Herenčić traveled together with Pavelić and other Ustaše to Trieste. The following morning Pavelić tasked Herenčić with traveling to Zagreb where he was supposed to meet with the Ustaše deputy leader, Slavko Kvaternik. Herenčić's mission to Zagreb was canceled after the Italian general Vittorio Ambrosio told Pavelić that the Ustaše could travel to Zagreb that day, as the Italian Army had reached Karlovac.
According to Tomasevich (War and Revolution in Yugoslavia, 1941-1945, Occupation and Collaboration, p. 59) Ustaše travelled by train from Pistoia to Trieste and there were provided buses before proceeding via Sušak to Karlovac. They reached Yugoslav border at Sušak at 2.10am on April 13. On April 14, Filippo Anfuso (sent by Mussolini personally) flew to Zagreb and then proceeded to Karlovac where he stopped Ustaše from moving further towards Zagreb before Pavelić confirmed he would cede territory to Italy. They reached Zagreb in early morning of 15 April.
While the article does not say that Ustaše travelled from Karlovac to Zagreb on 12 April, the passage appears to imply this. Since the article is currently a GAN, I do not wish to edit it in order to avoid appearance of instability, but maybe the nominator OakMapping or a future GA reviewer might wish to address this potential for confusion.--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:46, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out, I've added a sentence at the end of the paragraph to clarify this. Tomobe03 Could you check if it's better now? OakMapping (talk) 19:41, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, looks clearer now. Tweaked it a bit though.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:40, 5 July 2021 (UTC)