 | A fact from J. N. Petit Library appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 July 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DYK Nom
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 18:40, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that J. N. Petit Library
(pictured)in Mumbai is considered to be one of the finest examples of Neo-Gothic architecture in the city? Source
- Reviewed: No QPQ required; third nom.
Created by CallMeByYourMane (talk). Self-nominated at 17:04, 2 July 2020 (UTC).
The article is long enough and new enough with no copyright violations in the text, meeting DYK requirements. The hook is good and adequately cited. However, there's a potential copyright issue with the photograph. The source gives the year as "1938", not 1898. While a 1938 photo is now Public Domain in India since it's more than 60 years old (I've added the {{PD-India}} license tag), its U.S. copyright was restored by URAA. As such, the photo could only be included in the article as Fair Use, but not on DYK. So the original year of publication (1898 or 1938?) is determinative. JGHowes talk 15:06, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review JGHowes. If PD-India doesn't work for DYK, then let's remove it? Hope that works. CallMeByYourMane (talk) 16:46, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
. Passed, with photo not included on DYK. JGHowes talk 17:12, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
