Talk:Jab Se Tere Naina
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Narutolovehinata5 in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Narutolovehinata5 talk 01:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Closing per WP:DYKTIMEOUT; if there is an objection to it being rejected, a discussion can be started at WT:DYK regarding reopening the nomination.
( )
- ... that Ranbir Kapoor gave close to 100 takes for the 2007 Hindi-language song "Jab Se Tere Naina"?
- Reviewed:
Created by KunalAggarwal95 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 16:50, 6 July 2024 (UTC).
- As this is currently the oldest nomination that is completely unreviewed, @Launchballer: if you have time, could you please take a look at this? Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Sure, I was planning on reviewing this anyway. (I keep finding more and more stuff to say about Eliza Legzdina.) This is long enough and new enough. I don't see why you'd say 'close to 100 takes' when the quote in the source says "I did 45 or 50 takes one day and [then t]he next morning [...] I had to do another 70 takes"; come again with "more than 100". I would have raised my hackles at Missmalini.com, but it's been discussed at RSN and found to be fine so I'll take it. QPQ unnecessary. There's a fair amount of close paraphrasing throughout the article and this should be remedied before this can be ticked off.--Launchballer 07:22, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- My English is bad. If an editor could correct the problem of close paraphrasing, it would be great. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 16:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- @KunalAggarwal95: It is your responsibility to ensure that the text you add to Wikipedia does not have close paraphrasing. If your English is not strong enough to prevent this, you might need to reconsider how you can contribute to English Wikipedia, or consider contributing in another language's Wikipedia instead. Are you able to remove the close paraphrasing, or should this nomination be closed as unsuccessful? Z1720 (talk) 15:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Do you mean 'my English is bad and I don't know what close paraphrasing is'? If so, read that link. It's quite serious. Otherwise, what Z1720 said.--Launchballer 15:51, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Check article. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 17:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- @KunalAggarwal95: Better. I still think you should update the hook and article as I've suggested above.--Launchballer 08:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that Ranbir Kapoor gave more than 100 takes for the 2007 Hindi-language song "Jab Se Tere Naina"? KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 12:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Fine by me. I recommend WP:DYKTRIMming "the 2007 Hindi-language song", but this should be good to go.--Launchballer 13:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Noting that JioSaavn is not a RS, and the last line is pure WP:FANCRUFT. Sohom (talk) 21:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Check the article. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 06:45, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- I just did. It's now below 1500 characters and a stub.--Launchballer 12:57, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Check the article. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 06:45, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Noting that JioSaavn is not a RS, and the last line is pure WP:FANCRUFT. Sohom (talk) 21:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that Ranbir Kapoor gave more than 100 takes for the 2007 Hindi-language song "Jab Se Tere Naina"? KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 12:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- @KunalAggarwal95: Better. I still think you should update the hook and article as I've suggested above.--Launchballer 08:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Check article. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 17:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Do you mean 'my English is bad and I don't know what close paraphrasing is'? If so, read that link. It's quite serious. Otherwise, what Z1720 said.--Launchballer 15:51, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- @KunalAggarwal95: It is your responsibility to ensure that the text you add to Wikipedia does not have close paraphrasing. If your English is not strong enough to prevent this, you might need to reconsider how you can contribute to English Wikipedia, or consider contributing in another language's Wikipedia instead. Are you able to remove the close paraphrasing, or should this nomination be closed as unsuccessful? Z1720 (talk) 15:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- My English is bad. If an editor could correct the problem of close paraphrasing, it would be great. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 16:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Brought it to over 1500 characters. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 15:05, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- That you have, except this is still a stub.--Launchballer 10:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- This is now fine by me. (There is no set definition of what a stub is, but if it's too short to require section headings, then it's one in my book.) This is already on Approved, so it's up to the promoters.--Launchballer 14:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Marking as rejected per WP:DYKTIMEOUT. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Many nominations get approved even if they are more than 2 months old. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 16:37, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- This is now fine by me. (There is no set definition of what a stub is, but if it's too short to require section headings, then it's one in my book.) This is already on Approved, so it's up to the promoters.--Launchballer 14:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
