Talk:Jack Reed (Mississippi politician)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Jack Reed (politician) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:15, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jack Reed (Mississippi politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160128102641/http://www.wtva.com/news/Tupelo_businessman_Jack_Reed_Sr_dies_Wednesday.html to http://www.wtva.com/news/Tupelo_businessman_Jack_Reed_Sr_dies_Wednesday.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:07, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jack Reed (Mississippi politician)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Steelkamp (talk · contribs) 13:10, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I will be reviewing this article over the coming days. Good luck. Steelkamp (talk) 13:10, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Good article criteria

Well written

• Does Columbus refer to Columbus, Mississippi? I think it should be linked. Steelkamp (talk) 06:45, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Done.
• Good job, this is a very well written article. Steelkamp (talk) 06:45, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Verifiable with no original research

• "it was only chance I had to get elected" – From what I can access on Google Books, it seems he actually said "it was the only change I had to be elected". Steelkamp (talk) 06:45, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Not according to the one in my university database. -Indy beetle (talk) 22:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

    That's weird, I'll believe you. The quote is only slightly different anyway. Steelkamp (talk) 07:54, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Broad in its coverage

• and during the 1960s encouraged white residents to remain supportive of the local public schools despite federal integration orders. This sentence lacks background info. Someone that does not know the background would not know why people were pushing for public schools to close. Steelkamp (talk) 10:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
  • That there was a move to close public schools is made clear in the following sentence; I've linked massive resistance.
• Footnote 2 says Reed became one of the few prominent white Mississippians to contradict segregationist orthodoxy. I think that he was one of the few prominent white Mississippians to do so warrants mention. Steelkamp (talk) 10:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Done.

Neutral

Stable

Illustrated, if possible

• I recommend alt text for the images. Steelkamp (talk) 06:45, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Done.

General

That's it, putting this on hold. Very few points. This is a well written article. Steelkamp (talk) 10:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

• @Steelkamp: I've responded to your comments. -Indy beetle (talk) 22:46, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

  Passing the review now. Good job. Steelkamp (talk) 07:57, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.