Talk:Jacqueline Saburido

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Kingsif in topic sentence and trial


Photo

edit

Maybe a picture should be put on to this article. because it is about her face. and if people dont who dont how she looked before and after ,its realy no point--Matri 16:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I would not recommend to do something like that, her after images are extremely distubing for the regular viewers, specially the material that is used by the Texas Department of Transportation.

But maybe just a pre photo......... --Matrix17 15:37, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

No do not put a picture of her on this site. My school showed me her picture and I'm traumatized. Put a link and a warning besides it that says graphic images and viewer discretion advised.

"Boo hoo! I'm traumatized!" That's the whole point -- so next time you feel like rolling soused into the drivers seat or putting the foot down, you think how your actions might cause horrific injuries to some other poor person. Or yourself. But anyway, IMHO we shouldn't put a picture of Jacqui in this article without her permission at least... out of respect for one thing, but also because the pics from helpjacqui.com and the Texas government are probably copyright. --Jquarry 22:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
There is no copyright - You can use this images but I think it's not good idea. That's not good for example for children
Shut up. Every original image, photo or video is copyrighted by someone. If Wiki has Jacqueline's permission to put a current photo in this article, do it. It will raise more awareness to the drink-and-drive problem. She even posed by her own will for a campaign. I'm sure there are already many idiots out there humiliating her and using her photo(s) for "satire". There is an older man in my city with a completely burned and disfigured face, I see him regularly on the streets. Any child can see his face and point their fingers at him, any teenager can laugh at him. Yet he's brave enough not to stay at home because of his fate. 83.78.5.83 (talk) 11:34, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
No way in hell without an external link with a warning —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.252.68 (talk) 04:04, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

ok, first off wikipedia is not censored, so a picture of her wouldnt be a bad idea. i think there should be a warning at the top though, because some people may not want to see it —Preceding unsigned comment added by AustinGOLDENEYE (talkcontribs) 22:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, but I'm sure a picture of her would probably be considered a shock image. I saw a picture of her on a myspace bulletin and couldn't sleep the whole night. Gdfanatic21594 01:18, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

This conversation is ridiculous. It's her FACE. There's nothing she can do about it. There's nothing you can do about it. But saying she's a monster and should be hidden from view is morally reprehensible. Her portrait is not a shock photograph, nor does it need a warning. Biographies on Wikipedia are usually accompanied by the person's photograph. To say she's so ugly it's "bad for the children" is vile and wretched to the core. You should all be ashamed.<GeneralKlagg>

A photo of Saburido would be appropriate for her biography. Some of the discussion above is correct in that Wikipedia is not censored. I am surprised that we don't have a good representation of this Texas state-wide public story. In fact, the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission has her photo displayed here, and from what I understand, this is per her wish - Quote: Without hesitation, she agreed to a Texas Department of Transportation anti-DWI campaign. She's also posed for posters... [1]. She is a wonderful person for wanting to share her life changing event with others. I see no problem with adding her photo, which at least several should be available, and in public domain from the State of Texas. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 02:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Have you taken a freaking look at the gangrene article; it's friggin disturbing to put it mildly. I have tried to put a warning on top of the article, All the got me was an annoying wikinerd 101 don't vandalize message and a 24 h ban. GOOD LUCK 82.53.168.174 (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

There NEEDS to be a photo of her after the accident, WP:NOTCENSORED. The whole point of the article is a) her accident and b) her disfigurement. I wouldn't put it as a warning to drunken drivers (although it would serve that purpose too), but because the article would be a lot more clear with it. How the car was left would too be informative. I know this is kind of old, but, I just saw the mail. MEEEEEEEEE! (talk) 02:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Um...the article on pinworms has a picture so graphic that I had to call our computer department at work and tell them I'd seen it and it was on my hard drive. Jaqui, OTOH, has a face that is an illustration of the mission she's on to stop drunk driving. In fact, after having seen interviews with her, I don't find it disturbing at all. If you couldn't sleep at night after seeing a picture of a person with an injury, maybe you should get out more. I'm not trying to be insulting, but some folks need to spend more time in the company of people with disabilities and injuries. Helenabucket (talk) 21:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please, do include a current picture. Not only it will provide pertinent information, but also to omit it is a disrespect to the woman. 189.78.213.36 (talk) 16:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I personally think the fact that some of you say that graphic warning should be included is really heartless! after all she was human being who has gone through alot! and the fact that you talking about her like this is just rude. would any of us like it if someone says something like this about ourselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.94.75.154 (talk) 10:24, 24 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notability

edit

After investigating the matter, it appears that the subject is, in fact, notable per WP:N. Bearian (talk) 21:19, 4 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

This article needs pictures more than any other on Wikipedia

edit

It seems like a huge oversight to omit pictures of a woman who gave her picture to be used as an anti DUI message. Please correct this. Benvhoff (talk) 22:30, 11 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

How come no Spanish version of this article? I would think there must be one since she's from Venezuela and they speak Spanish there, but you got other languages of this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.182.50.139 (talk) 21:32, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

I find her video with Oprah to be of a beautiful woman behind a mask or something like that. Her voice has all of the quality and love of a beautiful woman. Shouldn't there be a link to her before and after pics? Her face appeared on Oprah and her video is on Youtube. I understand the feeling of trauma even though it doesn't affect me that way. I can't look at animal abuse pics. Some people can. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.193.6.38 (talk) 23:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jacqueline Saburido. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

sentence and trial

edit

I want more information about the trial on court and the sentence... how many years?... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.79.249.138 (talk) 10:43, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Go make an article on it then. It's not relevant here Kingsif (talk) 18:12, 28 April 2019 (UTC)Reply