Talk:Jainism and Sikhism

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Copyvio? http://www.indianchild.com/jainism.htm

The article starts out pretty clearly, but the end starts rambling and isn't wikified. A comparison of Jainism and Sikhism should really be more than just Jains do this, Sikhs do that (otherwise it's just comparing apples and oranges. More helpful would be to focusing on how they are each distinct in areas where a cursory understanding or an examination of foundations would make them appear similar. Wish I knew enough about either to do it. aww 19:30, 21 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

i agree this article needs alot of work. unfortunately im tied up with another badly written article at the moment.--Balvinder 00:28, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Questionable Line Should Be Removed?

edit

Under the subheading "Concepts of a Godhead", the author writes something like, "Sikhism does not have meaningless symbols and rituals." While I am not a Jainism Scholar, it does appear to me that, given the comparative nature of the exposition, the author makes a implicit (and ungrounded?) attack on the place of symbols and rituals in the tradition of Jainism. Perhaps this remark should be removed in order to preserve any objective work done on this page.

````Brandon Michael Garcia —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brandon.michael.garcia (talkcontribs) 03:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC).Reply

In th introduction, author says that Jainism reject authority of Vedas but not the values. The 2nd part of assumption is not correct. As per my knowledge, Jainism does not accept Vedas teaching in any form. If anyone thinks otherwiese, please provide a reliable source reference. Till then I have remove the "but" part. - Ashish13012009 09 Feb 2010

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jainism and Sikhism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:04, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply