Talk:Jakanachari

(Redirected from Talk:Jakanachari (sculptor))
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Extraordinary Writ in topic Requested move 19 October 2022

Untitled

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Kannada

edit

Kannada 2405:204:5002:A1D5:2503:BBA8:E6FA:BA63 (talk) 15:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 19 October 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved as unopposed. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)Reply



Jakanachari (sculptor)JakanachariWP:COMMONNAME for the sculptor is just "Jakanachari", and he seems to be PRIMARY. Jakanachari already redirects to this page. Ortizesp (talk) 18:26, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Expert tag

edit

@Nikh Nori: Could you explain why you think this article needs expert attention? {{Expert}} shouldn't be used with no reason. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:32, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article is poorly written. There are hardly any citations. And the content is mostly based on legends without any mention of the historicity of the person. For example, there is a lot of debate in the scholarly community on whether Jakanachari is a single person or a group of people. And whether he actually built all the hundreds of temples that are attributed to him. There are even questions about his very existence by some scholars. The article has no information on that. And it is completely based on folklore shown in popular films. A scholar on Indian history or architecture would improve the article to a great extent. And, that's the reason for adding the tag. Nikh Nori (talk) 17:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply