Talk:Jakarta Faces

The second part of the Struts section reads like an essay ('Articles that include thoughts or analysis or appear to advance a position or agenda'). Jep 16:56, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:EL policy

re JSF Best Practices and User:E_dog95's link removals

Moved from User talk:Andy Dingley so that others interested on this article can see it. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

I provided the Wikipedia policy. WP:ELNO # 10 and # 11 apply here. Whether or not it's useful is not a Wikipedia policy.E_dog95' ^{Hi '} 02:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Not everything is a "blog", just because it's hosted through Wordpress and the like. Now purging EL's to "web log" and "web-hosted diary" sites is fine (maybe not in some high-profile bios of bloggers notable for their blogs), but this is technical content relevant to a technical article. It's also useful technical content that's relevant to the article and not covered by the article itself - one of the main use cases for WP:EL. Wikipedia doesn't really recognise how the tech world works sometimes: the fact that people wo work in the tech field use that field as their publishing medium. Journalists write in newspapers, academics publish in peered journals, geeks do it online. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

OK, I see that you're now stripping most of the other ELs from the article and putting it down under a comment of reverting my edits, so it's not obvious what you're up to. Please don't use the words "good faith" around such an action, it confuses people. 8-( Andy Dingley (talk) 09:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Please some info or reference for JSR-301 (JSF-bridge for portlets) specs. Thx! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.206.41.100 (talk) 14:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Article Cleanup/reversion

The current revision is poorly organized and includes many grammatical errors. The revision done on Oct 11 by Kd4ttc was much clearer (though lacking some useful information) than the current edits done on Oct 25 by Nicephotog. I propose that the article be reverted to the Oct 11 revision and reworked from there.
--Raztus (talk) 20:36, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

what is a life-cycle conflict? that needs to be defined Jeremy Leipzig (talk) 00:58, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

As a quick answer, in this case it's when the ordering or steps needed to be taken to process a request conflict with how the underlying technology processes things. For example, in JSF one needs to observe the component tree (build by the view description) in order to learn about the meta data associated with that page. In XML this is not a problem, but in JSP you can't really obtain this component tree without executing the page, possibly causing several side effects. This is a life-cycle conflict between what JSF needs and how JSP does it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arjant (talk • contribs) 10:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

remove the marketing bullshit.

This is nonsense or worse: "As a display technology, JSF 2 uses Facelets, an efficient, simple, and powerful view description language (VDL)" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.246.4.28 (talk) 23:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

home page not accessible

no DNS entry, is it dead? --Ayacop (talk) 14:12, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on JavaServer Faces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130816012958/http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/tutorial/doc/home.htm to http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/tutorial/doc/home.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150810230104/http://memorynotfound.com/category/java/jsf/ to http://memorynotfound.com/category/java/jsf/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 22 November 2017 (UTC)