Talk:Jakov of Kamena Reka
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
На въпроса, идентични ли са Яков от Камена река и Яков от София, продължават да се дават противоречиви отговори
editThe discussion about this article was held on the talkpage of one editor (link). Since this discussion affected the content of this article, it is good to have a note about it here.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 15:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- The text says: However some researchers maintain that Jakov of Sofia and Jakov of Kamena Reka are different historical persons. Jingiby (talk) 15:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- I did not complain about the text. Like I explained above, I just felt that a note with link to this discussion should be placed here because this page was the right place to discuss the text of the article. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 15:13, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Hercegovina
editThis view is outdated in any case. All sources I have found, which support it are from the 19th. or from the first half of the 20th. century. There is only one, that is nearly 50 years old. Jingiby (talk) 15:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Per WP:INTEGRITY, "if a sentence or paragraph is footnoted with a source, adding material to that sentence which is not supported by the source is highly misleading. So when new text is inserted into a paragraph, make sure it is clear which facts the inline citations support". If there are sources that this assertion is fringe or outdated then add it as separate assertion. Don't change referenced assertion.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 15:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- If I see it was an early Serbian misinterpretation of Kolašin in today Montenegro in wider Herzegovinan area with Kolasia, or Kyustendil in today Bulgaria, in a wider Macedonian area: „Kolasijski grad" hat nichts mit Kolasin in Montenegro zu tun, Названието Коласия за Кюстендил, което днес се е съхранило в името на кюстендилското предградие Колуша, излиза от официална книжовна употреба едва след западането на Печката патриаршия през 1766 г. Дотогава, както в Яковите книги, то е обичайното название за гр. Кюстендил в цялата южнославянска книжнина. Jakov claimed: изидохь с Mакедоние отчества моего и вьнидохь у вь западнja странахь, i.e he was not from Herzegovina but from Macedonia. He also maintained: родину и отчствомь бехь иже вь подкрули великие гори осоговцеи близь коласискаго града в места нарицаема камена река... That means he originated from a location in Osogovo called Kamena Reka, near the town of Kolosia, and Osogovo is too far from Hercegovina. Jingiby (talk) 15:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Flag-waving is completely unnecessary here. Ivan Kukuljević Sakcinski, Svend Dahl and Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti (L. Hartman in Zagreb 1897) are far from "early Serbian". --Antidiskriminator (talk) 16:30, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- If I see it was an early Serbian misinterpretation of Kolašin in today Montenegro in wider Herzegovinan area with Kolasia, or Kyustendil in today Bulgaria, in a wider Macedonian area: „Kolasijski grad" hat nichts mit Kolasin in Montenegro zu tun, Названието Коласия за Кюстендил, което днес се е съхранило в името на кюстендилското предградие Колуша, излиза от официална книжовна употреба едва след западането на Печката патриаршия през 1766 г. Дотогава, както в Яковите книги, то е обичайното название за гр. Кюстендил в цялата южнославянска книжнина. Jakov claimed: изидохь с Mакедоние отчества моего и вьнидохь у вь западнja странахь, i.e he was not from Herzegovina but from Macedonia. He also maintained: родину и отчствомь бехь иже вь подкрули великие гори осоговцеи близь коласискаго града в места нарицаема камена река... That means he originated from a location in Osogovo called Kamena Reka, near the town of Kolosia, and Osogovo is too far from Hercegovina. Jingiby (talk) 15:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jakov of Kamena Reka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140408213329/http://www.ciela.com/ciela_books/downloadable/download/linkSample/link_id/1612/ to http://www.ciela.com/ciela_books/downloadable/download/linkSample/link_id/1612/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 20 November 2017 (UTC)