Talk:Janakpuri
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
this looks more like an advertising page for the locality
Needs more information
editThis article badly needs a basic plan of the colony. The nuetrality needs to be questioned as article sounds like self priase. Hence needs to be re written in Encyclopedia style. --Aileronajay 05:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC) The article requires the details of Authorities governing housing records, taxes etc as well — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.173.131.135 (talk) 06:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag TALK2ME 04:13, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Article rewrite
editI've rewritten the article from scratch, as the text of previous versions was almost entirely copypasted from this website, and to address various cleanup issues. I realise that this has resulted in a drastically smaller article: feel free to add more information, but please make sure that any added information is not a copyright violation. Cheers. – Liveste (talk • edits) 12:24, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
- Upon consulting with User:Bhuvee, the previous version has been re-instated. As it turns out, the Wikipedia article on Janakpuri was not a copyright violation: rather, the external site seems to have copied the Wikipedia article, and inappropriately displayed a copyright notice. Apologies for the confusion. Cheers. – Liveste (talk • edits) 13:49, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Can we remove random trivia / popular culture
editThere is a random trivia in the popular culture section which says "Shruti Kakkar, the protagonist from the 2010 Bollywood film, Band Baaja Baaraat, hailed from Janakpuri". I don't see anything encyclopaedic in this and other articles do not have similar info. If no one objects, I would suggest removing this.--DreamLinker (talk) 15:41, 19 July 2017 (UTC)