Talk:Janet Jackson (album)/Archive 1

Archive 1

Tenth biggest selling R&B album of 1982 claim

This is not properly sourced (the link is to a fan site which doesn't specify who originally made the claim), and strikes me as essentially indiscriminate information. Unless someone provides a better source, I'm planning to remove it shortly as part of a general copy edit. Gusworld (talk) 22:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

it's mostly a pop album

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Say_You_Do http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Come_Give_Your_Love_to_Me http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Love_(Janet_Jackson_song) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_Mess_Up_This_Good_Thing_(song)Beggsie221 (talk) 09:50, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Janet Jackson (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 02:38, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

I will review this article. — Cirt (talk) 02:38, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Image review

One fair use image used. File:JanetJacksonDebutCover.jpg with appropriate fair use rationale on image page. No issues here. — Cirt (talk) 04:11, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Stability review

1. Article edit history is stable going back a good amount of time.
2. Inspection of talk page shows no major conflicts.

No issues here, next, on to rest of review. — Cirt (talk) 04:13, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

GA table

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Writing quality is good, but could use some improvements here and there, I'd suggest WP:GOCE as a next step.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Good lede section, good style presentation. I'd look through the article for some ways to shorten sentences, watch out for overusage of commas, and remove superfluous words like "also", "but", "although", "though", etc.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Duly cited throughout to appropriate references.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	I'd strongly recommend adding "archiveurl" and "archivedate" parameters to all cites if possible to archived links from Internet Archive.
	2c. it contains no original research.	Reliant primarily on secondary sources throughout.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Reception and Promotion sects could stand with a bit more expansion going forwards.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Yes, good focus on topic, no problems here.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	I particularly like the way the lede intro sect presents the material very neutrally while also admitting the mixed reviews.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Passes here, per above.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Passes here, per above.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Passes here, per above.
	7. Overall assessment.	Overall, nice job, I hope my above pointers and suggestions going forwards are helpful. — Cirt (talk) 03:41, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Janet Jackson (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.allmusic.com/album/janet-jackson-r10040

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Janet Jackson (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121024063102/http://charts.org.nz/showitem.asp?interpret=Janet+Jackson&titel=Janet+Jackson&cat=a to http://charts.org.nz/showitem.asp?interpret=Janet+Jackson&titel=Janet+Jackson&cat=a
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5jW8qIpnZ?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mi2n.com%2Fpress.php3%3Fpress_nb%3D47877 to http://www.mi2n.com/press.php3?press_nb=47877
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rsg.co.za/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)