Talk:Japanese destroyer Ume (1944)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 05:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

I have generally found the articles nominated by Sturmvogel 66 to be of high quality and this looks of a similar nature. It will complete my review shortly. simongraham (talk) 05:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

This looks in very good shape. Earwig reports a 3.8% chance of violation, which is very impressive. Spot checks confirm Stille and Sturton.

A few comments:

• Please change the numbers less than ten to words as per MOS:NUMERAL such as "5 additional".
• Suggest abbreviating "127-millimeter", "25-millimeter", "610-millimeter" etc.
  • I generally prefer to spell them out. If nothing else than to remind people that they need to be hyphenated in that format.
    • As there does not seem to be any guidance on this, I am happy to accept that argument.
• The final paragraph before the Battle of Ormoc Bay ends with "She would then..." Suggest adding a sentence to explain whether this happened in reality.

@Sturmvogel 66: Please ping me when you would like me to look over this again. simongraham (talk) 13:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

@Simongraham: Thanks for the review; see if my changes are acceptable.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

@Sturmvogel 66: Looks good. Nice to get a quick review. I believe the article meets the criteria to be a Good Article. simongraham (talk) 14:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Pass simongraham (talk) 14:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.