Talk:Japanese in Chicago
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph of Heiwa Terrace (Japanese senior citizen center), 920 West Lawrence Avenue (corner of Sheridan Road and Lawrence Avenue), Chicago, Illinois 60640. be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Chicago may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() | On 11 February 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Japanese-American culture in Chicago. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Organizations
editAt least 2 Japanese orgs (service and historical) are listed at Chicago Cultural Alliance, so this article would benefit from something about them. -- Alanscottwalker (talk) 11:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for bringing them up! I'm getting them listed! WhisperToMe (talk) 16:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Mid-America Japanese Club
edithttp://web.archive.org/web/20050308044015/http://www.japaneseclub.org/ The Mid-America Japanese Club was based in Mount Prospect, Illinois but now it is based in Arlington Heights. The name in English later changed to the Chicago Japanese Club.
http://web.archive.org/web/20110722155627im_/http://www.japaneseclub.org/webbanner.jpg shows that the Japanese name was always the "Chicago Japanese Club" WhisperToMe (talk) 16:32, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
RfC
editThe title of this article is potentially impacted by the outcome of this Request for comment re: entries about ethnic groups in the United States. Page watchers are invited to participate in the ongoing discussion. Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 20:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Requested move 11 February 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 01:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Japanese in Chicago → Japanese-American culture in Chicago
- Japanese community of Columbus, Ohio → Japanese-American culture in Columbus, Ohio
- History of the Japanese in Metro Detroit → Japanese-American culture in Metro Detroit
- History of the Japanese in Houston → Japanese-American culture in Houston
- History of the Japanese in Los Angeles → Japanese-American culture in Los Angeles
- Japanese in New York City → Japanese-American culture in New York City
- History of the Japanese in Portland, Oregon → Japanese-American culture in Portland, Oregon
- History of the Japanese in Seattle → Japanese-American culture in Seattle
- History of the Japanese in San Francisco → Japanese-American culture in San Francisco
– We're using different titles for articles with similar scopes. Striving for consistency here. I think the "Japanese-American culture in X" format is most universal and allows articles to cover more than just history. It also follows our category structure Category:Japanese-American culture. --Another Believer (Talk) 02:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. Using "culture" in the title limits the scope of these articles far too much. Much or most of the content in most of the articles is history. If an expansion of the footprint is desired, moving e.g. History of the Japanese in Seattle to Japanese in Seattle might be in order. — AjaxSmack 05:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose This is not the scope of these articles. Walrasiad (talk) 14:35, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Walrasiad Do you have a preferred title, so we can make these consistent? ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. The content of articles such as History of the Japanese in Seattle is clearly history focused. There may be justification to create a separate article that is dedicated to culture, but I feel that the history content should remain in its own article.—Myasuda (talk) 16:21, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Myasuda Do you think these articles should have similar titles, and if so, are you advocating for "History of the Japanese in XXX" format for all? ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:19, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- The articles each have different scope and coverage, so I won't make any recommendations about a uniform naming convention for all of them. But for some articles such as the Seattle one, I don't think removing history from the article title is the best option.—Myasuda (talk) 02:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)