Talk:Japanese in Chicago

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Robertsky in topic Requested move 11 February 2023

Organizations

edit

At least 2 Japanese orgs (service and historical) are listed at Chicago Cultural Alliance, so this article would benefit from something about them. -- Alanscottwalker (talk) 11:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for bringing them up! I'm getting them listed! WhisperToMe (talk) 16:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Mid-America Japanese Club

edit

http://web.archive.org/web/20050308044015/http://www.japaneseclub.org/ The Mid-America Japanese Club was based in Mount Prospect, Illinois but now it is based in Arlington Heights. The name in English later changed to the Chicago Japanese Club.

http://web.archive.org/web/20110722155627im_/http://www.japaneseclub.org/webbanner.jpg shows that the Japanese name was always the "Chicago Japanese Club" WhisperToMe (talk) 16:32, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

RfC

edit

The title of this article is potentially impacted by the outcome of this Request for comment re: entries about ethnic groups in the United States. Page watchers are invited to participate in the ongoing discussion. Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 20:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 11 February 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 01:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply


– We're using different titles for articles with similar scopes. Striving for consistency here. I think the "Japanese-American culture in X" format is most universal and allows articles to cover more than just history. It also follows our category structure Category:Japanese-American culture. --Another Believer (Talk) 02:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The articles each have different scope and coverage, so I won't make any recommendations about a uniform naming convention for all of them. But for some articles such as the Seattle one, I don't think removing history from the article title is the best option.—Myasuda (talk) 02:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.