Talk:Jason Emer

Latest comment: 15 hours ago by WikiProCreate in topic Why It Needs to Be Deleted

Emer or someone from his office is deleting information

edit

The information regarding Dr. Emers pending medical license revocation has been deleted twice. I believe he, or someone from his staff, is intentionally removing this information to hide it from the public. 128.23.128.26 (talk) 11:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Why It Needs to Be Deleted

edit

1. It was moved from draft space to article space before it was reviewed and made live by the creator of the page

2. It was moved to draft space by other editors due to promotional tone, it seemed as it was written by someone closely connected to the subject

3. It was proposed for deletion and the final decision was to keep. However, the keep voters: 1 was a new account created just for this debate only (seems like it and it was an open IP, one was an editor banned for sock-puppetry)

4. There is someone constantly removing a section that is a bit negative about the subject

All this makes me believe that this page is being managed by someone closely connected to the subject. Additionally, i don't believe the subject is notable and most of the references are PRs and he is constantly self-promoting on the internet. He may become noteworthy enough later down the line but for now, the subject does not need to have a page on Wikipeda. Anyone who can make me understand why it should be kept, please let me know. I am very curious and believe i spotted a promotional activity on this platform.

WikiProCreate (talk) 05:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

It should be deleted, but if not, the information regarding the California trial and the suspension of his medical license should be included 128.23.255.9 (talk) 17:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have proposed deletion of this page. I wonder how did the previous discussion end with 'keep.'
WikiProCreate (talk) 11:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have proposed deletion of this page for all the reasons I have highlighted previously. No action was taken and I am surprised about why is it still being so clear that it has been published and managed by someone related to the subject.

WikiProCreate (talk) 11:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The WP:PROD process may not be used on an article that has survived an AfD. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Noted. Thanks for pointing that out. I have moved it to draftspace for the page creator to look into the issues mentioned.
WikiProCreate (talk) 20:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
@WikiProCreate: Sending to draftspace was absolutely a mistake. See WP:DRAFTNO which clearly states that articles older than 90 days should never be draftified. I've now restored the page in mainspace, but maybe you should consider sending this article to AfD. CycloneYoris talk! 22:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Noted. Thank you for letting me know. I'll look into the Afd option.
WikiProCreate (talk) 03:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I cannot find anything about renominating a page for Afd. Can you help me, if going for Afd is an option in this case? Appreciate all your help.
Thank you. WikiProCreate (talk) 04:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply