Talk:Jason Sendwe

Latest comment: 2 years ago by AwesomeAlex261 in topic For what it's worth
Featured articleJason Sendwe is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 23, 2022.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 3, 2018Good article nomineeListed
December 3, 2018Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 2, 2021Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Source review info

edit

To check as many errors as possible in the references and/or notes, I recommend using User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck in conjunction with two other scripts. You can install them as follows:

  • First, copy/paste importScript('User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js'); to Special:MyPage/common.js .
  • On the same page and below that script add importScript('User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck.js');. Save that page.
  • Finally go to to Special:MyPage/common.css and add .citation-comment {display: inline !important;} /* show all Citation Style 1 error messages */.

When you've added all those, go to an article to check for various messages in its notes and references. (You may need to clear your browser's cache first). The output of User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck is not foolproof and can be verbose. Use common sense when interpreting output (especially with respect to sorting errors). Reading the explanatory page will help more than a little. The least urgent message of all is probably Missing archive link;. Archiving weblinks is good practice but lack of archiving will probably not be mentioned in any content review. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 03:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Jason Sendwe/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 02:50, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 02:50, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Can we get a link or explanation for "Conseil protestant du Congo"?
  • Footnote added.
  • In the national election for the Republic of the Congo's independence in Sendwe earned a seat: looks like a missing date after "in"?
  • Revised as "In the national elections before the Republic of the Congo's independence on 30 June 1960 Sendwe earned a seat".
  • What is a "preferential vote"? If this means a preference voting system was used, I think an explanation (or note) would be better than just the adjective.
    The source states, "Député national élu sur la liste du Cartel avec 20.283 voix de préférence dans le district d’E’ville." I'm not sure what exactly is meant by "votes of preference" but the preferential system appears to be the most likely explanation.
    I agree, but I think it's best not to make assumptions. I'd make this just "votes", which is definitely correct. If you feel the adjective is important, I'd add a note saying "the source describes them as 'preferential votes' without giving more details about the voting method". Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
    @Mike Christie: Removed the adjective.
  • he acted as its rapporteur: I don't know what this means. Is it a position with defined functions, or is this just the French word in the sources for the nature of his role?
    The French word was given by the English language source. There seems to be no exact translation, but it names a role of person designated the task of "reporting" back to a deliberative body on a subject or set of findings.
    Google Translate, which gives definitions as well, defines it as "Person responsible for reporting an assembly, an event before an authority, a group." How about "appointed by the Chamber to serve on a reconciliation commission, and report on its activities"? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
    Wikilinked the term.
  • BALUBAKAT began to organize its own administration of the province: this is North Katanga? I think a little more background is needed; since Katanga is not reintegrated till 1963, evidently that's separate; so North Katanga and Katanga are non-overlapping?
  • Added that Katanga was split up after it was reintegrated into the country.

-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:57, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Looks good now; promoting. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:06, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

For what it's worth

edit

Potential source: [1] -Indy beetle (talk) 20:45, 3 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

==

  Cookies!

AwesomeAlex261 has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.


To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

==

Cookies!!!! AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 16:01, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply