Talk:Jaysingpur

Education section is worthless

What value does the education section have? It says things that probably apply anywhere and has some possible spam, and no citations at all. Orchestra Player (talk) 18:51, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

I've removed the spam. Not sure that the things said there would "apply anywhere": I doubt every minor Indian city has post-graduate education facilities, as well as schools specialising in engineering and medicine. Let's focus on finding citations rather than simply removing the section. Thanks – Quasar G ^{t - c} 19:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

OK "is famous" is great if there's an RS but really needs one.

"Education from first standard to post graduation is available in the city." Ok interesting I guess, no need to cite.

"Postgraduate education in the field of engineering and medical is also available there." Not too sure of the relevance but maybe ok.

"Schools in Jaysingpur are either "municipal schools" or private schools (run by trusts or individuals), which in some cases receive financial aid from the government. The schools are affiliated either with the Maharashtra State Board (MSBSHSE), The all-India Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations (CISCE), National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS), or the Central Board for Secondary Education (CBSE). Marathi - Semi English & English is the usual language of instruction. The government-run public schools lack many facilities, but are the only option for poorer residents who cannot afford the more expensive private schools." probably applies throughout Maharashstra and doesn't need to be repeated in every article for every town. Orchestra Player (talk) 19:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

It seems like the only real problematic section was that last one, and we may as well keep it in. We must assume readers have not read any other articles about Maharashstra, and even if they have done it doesn't hurt to include the info. Quasar G ^{t - c} 19:12, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Should this info then be copied to every similar article? Orchestra Player (talk) 19:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Religious places

This section is indeed unreferenced, and looks like a tourist guide. However, many articles on Indian cities have a section on religious places. This section should be converted to prose, or, failing that, left as it is, rather than being removed. Quasar G ^{t - c} 19:17, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

What would be a good model for this? and (btw remember WP:OSE) Orchestra Player (talk) 19:20, 23 April 2017 (UTC)