Talk:Jeff Tambellini/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 16:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Lead is a bit off. The phrase "He is known as a fast-skating offensive player." is not in the body of the article nor is it referenced. The only mention of his skating ability is prior to the draft when it says "superior skater and defensively responsible" but there is nothing about being an offensive player and his NHL statistics would go against assuming that. I seems odd to just have the one line about being in the NHL before talking about his junior career and coming back to his NHL/AHL career. I might be better to for go saying he was drafted in his Freshman year at Michigan and combined the second paragraph with the opening two sentences. Also maybe work in his international appearance.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Links are good for the most part. Link #13 -"Islanders acquire two top prospects from L.A" redirects to the Islanders home page. It shouldn't be too hard to replace. The inline citation is good. Information checks out from the internet links.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All images contain proper licensing.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Just a few things to take care of. After which I will go through one more time to make sure I didn't miss anything, but its a solid article as usual.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 16:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Think I managed to take care of the two above issues. Thanks a lot for the review.. there's always such a long lineup for sports GANs. Cheers! Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 04:25, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Everything looks great! I've gone ahead and passed it. Glade to see you keeping up the great work.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 04:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)