Talk:Jem (singer)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Alliwalk in topic Why is Moby relevant?

It's Amazing

edit

The page for the single It's Amazing is Incomplete —Preceding unsigned comment added by TeddyDTE (talkcontribs) 14:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Article name

edit

I have several problems with the title of this article.

  1. Disambiguation titles are generally not capitalized, so it should be Jem (singer).
  2. Even as Jem (singer), it is not disambiguated enough from Jem (animated), who is also a singer, fictional though she may be.

At this point, I would suggest Jem Griffiths or Jem (singer-songwriter) to properly disambiguate her? I know that neither of these is particularly appealing, but I can't think of another way around this. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 15:40, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)

On second thought, I think that the animated Jem was also a songwriter, so that doesn't work either. The general rule of disambiguation titles is to have the most generic term possible that does not encapsulate another article or concept. Is Jem (live singer) too clunky? --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 15:49, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
I've just moved this page from Jem Griffiths, on the grounds that she's known as Jem and her real name is Jemma Griffiths, and the hybrid Jem Griffiths is rarely, if ever, used.
And the trouble with the capitalization is that there was already a redirect page for Jem (singer) and I didn't know how to erase it so that I could move the existing page to that name. So I compromised.
I suspect that a real person should take precedence over a cartoon character, and in any case Jem (animated) refers to the series and not the character. If anyone does an article on the fictional Jem I'd suggest atitle such as Jem (fictional singer) or Jem (animated character).
Anyway, I've just spent a lot longer than I thought fixing links, so if anybody decides to move this page again I'll be happy to leave it all up to them!!!
Yr obedient (ha!) servant...
Lee M 15:54, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Well, the issue isn't so much about precedence, but disambiguation titles are supposed to remove ambiguity. Even if the animated singer was at (fictional singer), then the Jem (singer) link would still not properly disambiguate. Also, the "real person" v. "fictional person" is not enough of a criteria to decide who should get the main article. I'm not sure what the precedent is so I'll bring it up at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 16:11, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
I feel that DropDeadGorgias is being slightly too pedantic and treating Wikipedia users as if they are stupid. Jem is a singer - that is what she does. The other article is about a fictional character. That's all. Whatever attributes the fictional character has doesn't matter when it comes to changing the article name. Most users can work out the difference. 92.1.178.198 (talk) 11:45, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

for consistency with other articles... and fixed most of the redirects too. - MykReeve 21:17, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Fair use rationale for Image:JemWishIPt1.jpg

edit
 

Image:JemWishIPt1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:JemTheyPt1.jpg

edit
 

Image:JemTheyPt1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:JemJustARidePt1.jpg

edit
 

Image:JemJustARidePt1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Jem - 24.jpg

edit
 

Image:Jem - 24.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC) i like jemReply

"Jem was born a long time ago..." ouch, burn!

edit

I've changed it to something less abrasive. :) Musicguyguy (talk) 23:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply


Biography edit

edit

I've thoroughly researched and edited the biographical content of the article, splitting it into relevant, chronological sections. I hope that content, links and references are all of a high encyclopaedic standard for readers. Cheers :) Atonement1992 14, February 2013 —Preceding undated comment added 00:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Am unable to find much firm information online regarding the promotional release of the single "24" - sources conflict in saying it was released in 2003 to promote the album in the US, and others say it was released in 2005 to promote the album in Europe. Due to this lack of any firm references I removed any information on 24 as being a single, it wasn't an official single anyway. However, if anyone can find information on the matter, feel free to include... Cheers, Peter Atonement1992

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Jem (singer)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The article is a promising one but needs more prose, specially on the lines of critical as well as mass reception --soumtalk 16:22, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


I have majorly researched and edited the biography section of Jem and hope it is of encyclopaedic standard for users. Thanks. Peter - Atonemen1992 (Feb 14, 2013) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atonement1992 (talkcontribs) 00:34, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 00:35, 14 February 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 19:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jem (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jem (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Why is Moby relevant?

edit

In the section, "2004–2006: Finally Woken", the first sentence begins, "After the success of Moby's album Play (1999)..."

This is the first time Moby is mentioned. I keep reading to understand what Moby has to do with anything. Did she sing on the album? Was there an agreement she would wait until his release? Moby's album was released in 1999; this section is 2004-2006.

There should be more information because it's not clear what Moby's 5 year old album has to do with Jem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alliwalk (talkcontribs) 15:10, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply