This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 5 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I uploaded the author portrait from Wikicommons, believing it to be fair use, but now I see there's a named photographer. Can anyone help out by uploading a more suitable image, please? ArthurTheGardener (talk) 12:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I meant "inserting," and not "uploading." I'm not connected to her; I just saw she didn't have a page when I was editing Gareth Powell's article. ArthurTheGardener (talk) 11:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... The author is a Nebula nominee with a recognizable body of work. I see no valid reason that the page (which was reviewed and approved by my mentor) should be deleted. ArthurTheGardener (talk) 07:43, 19 May 2024 (UTC) --ArthurTheGardener (talk) 07:43, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've removed the notice; thanks for following its instructions. I have no idea why two people have created new accounts just to delete this page... Aaron Liu (talk) 13:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
The subject of this page is a self-published author with minimal micro-press publishing history. Someone needs to clearly explain why this person requires a Wikipedia page. Nominations for awards are not notable, especially as they are made by the public and were presumably, in these instances, made by her husband. This page is clearly self-promotional with content supplied by the subject. It qualifies for speedy deletion. Thestingsauce (talk) 15:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
In my opinion, being nominated for a Nebula award and two BSFA awards is sizable enough to possibly satisfy "significant critical attention", and definitely enough for a WP:credible claim of significance. It is definitely not enough for A7, and if you still think this isn't notable enough, take it to WP:AfD. I also highly doubt that Arthur is Jendia Gammon owing to his other interests, and I again urge you to WP:assume good faith.Again, I'm curious what motivated you to find this article and create an account because you wanted to delete it. Aaron Liu (talk) 17:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply