Talk:Jenilca Giusti

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Otr500 in topic External links

Issues

edit

I have done some copy-editting on the article, however it still suffers from numerous issues, such as POV (words like "Great", "Fabulous" etc.). Although I removed most of it, there's still some left. I would like to have some other editors take a look on it and take necessary action. AVandtalkcontribs 22:03, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit
There are six entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.
  • ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  • LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
  • WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links.
  • WP:ELCITE: access dates are not appropriate in the external links section. Do not use {{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section. -- Otr500 (talk) 03:04, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply