Talk:Jessica Mulroney
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jessica Mulroney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160320040249/http://www.canada.com/story.html?id=7bac6916-54dd-4a4b-ad81-c9bb97e020b3 to http://www.canada.com/story.html?id=7bac6916-54dd-4a4b-ad81-c9bb97e020b3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
linkectomy
editI reverted a linkectomy. I think policy did not support the linkectomy. Redlinks should only be removed when it is unlikely the topic could support an article, which is not the case here. Plus redlinks are useful, for finding other articles that link to the topic, an early step in creating an article. Geo Swan (talk) 01:07, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
informationectomy
editI reverted an informationectomy. Her work for the daughter in law of her father-in-law's rival did stir comment.
In this edit a contributor removed coverage of her friendship with Meghan Markle, with the edit summary "I've got mates too. Doesn't belong on WP, though." Surely that is not the right test? Yes, we all have friends. And surely, if reliable sources discuss our friendships, that makes those friendships something potentially belonging on the wikipedia? Geo Swan (talk) 01:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)