Talk:Jicarilla Apache

Geronimo

I am unable to find a credible citation for:

The Jicarilla Band of Apache are the single band that refused to cooperate with the United States military in trying to locate Geronimo.

Does anyone know where this statement may have come from?--CaroleHenson (talk) 02:51, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

NEW MEXICO'S BLUE BOOK ON-LINE

The following external link to NEW MEXICO'S BLUE BOOK ON-LINE because it results in a page not found

• Jicarilla Apache Tribe (New Mexico's Blue Book On-Line)

Through google searches, I found the splash page, but clicking on any of the sections results in a page not found message. http://www.sos.state.nm.us/sos-2010bluebook.html

So, I removed this from the external link. If someone knows a way to get to the "Native American Section" or "Jicarilla Apache Tribe" page, then that would be GREAT!--CaroleHenson (talk) 07:57, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

File:A Jicarilla Man, 1904, Edward S. Curtis (sepia restored).jpg

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:A Jicarilla Man, 1904, Edward S. Curtis (sepia restored).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 27, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-06-27. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the day

A portrait of a Jicarilla Apache man, taken by Edward S. Curtis in 1904. The Jicarilla, who refer to themselves as Tinde or Dinde (meaning "The People"), were originally a nomadic people who lived in the area around what is now Colorado and New Mexico. Interaction with Europeans starting in the 1700s led to the Jicarilla being forced off their sacred lands, and the following two centuries were filled with strife, including a battle against the US 1st Cavalry Regiment. By the time of this photograph, the Jicarilla had abandoned their nomadic ways and were living on a reservation; the land of the reservation was not fit for agriculture and malnutrition and tuberculosis were widespread.Photo: Edward S. Curtis; restoration: Keraunoscopia

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Jicarilla Apache/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

mix of people and linguistics articles; needs separation. --Skookum1 (10 May 06) Have now been separated (see Jicarilla language. I've put the comments related to the language section there). This is a short stub, though. --Miskwito 22:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 22:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 19:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jicarilla Apache. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929122917/http://web.abqtrib.com/archives/diversions04/032604_diversions_tales.shtml to http://web.abqtrib.com/archives/diversions04/032604_diversions_tales.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jicarilla Apache. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110911062656/http://www.nmmagazine.com/native_american/jicarilla.php to http://www.nmmagazine.com/native_american/jicarilla.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Lots of uncited content

This article had an addition of a lot of uncited content beginning in April 2012. Since it's been about 10 years, and no one has come up with citations in that time, I removed the uncited content (one of the options for resolving uncited content).

See {{Ref improve}}, which would be an appropriate tag at the article level due to the amount of uncited content: "Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed."

Just to be a bit clearer: If someone adds content from their understanding, vs. a reliable source, there's no way to know if that information is a / the commonly understood viewpoint. Using sources is a good way to identify where that information came from - and perhaps ferret out whether the source is a reliable source for that info or perhaps if there is a better source / understanding of the info. (I hope that makes sense.)

If someone would like to research these items to return some / all of the content, that would be lovely. Here's a diff with the removed content: here.–CaroleHenson (talk) 20:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)