Talk:Jiiva
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
article seems too biased
editThe article seems too biased and doesn't seem to be NPOV, is probably written by a fan. Needs to be made neutral. --Madhu 13:52, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- Yes i created it with minimal info, but others made the article as his complete biography. We will try to make it short and better article --M.arunprasad 05:29, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Jeevamanaa.jpg
editImage:Jeevamanaa.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Up coming films
editJeeva is on a high thanks to Katcheri Arambam. His next release after Siva Manasula Sakthi, he is looking forward to this release and a hat trick. In an exclusive interview, he tells us whats special about this film for him…
You have kept news about this film Katcheri Arambam mostly under wraps. How much of the film is completed? Its directed by Thiravanan who has assisted Seeman and others earlier. Its under RB Chowdarys Super Good Films banner and my 5th film with my dad. Music is by Immaan. 2 schedules have been completed. Only 15 days shooting is left and most of the film is over. We have two songs in Agra and Rajasthan remaining to be shot. Yes, we haven’t divulged much about the film so far but its due for a Divali release.
Whats your role in it and who is your co-star? I play a boy who is quite vetti ( unemployed vagabond type) in the film. But he is rich and he comes from the village to the city. He is very crooked and knows how to get his way diplomatically in life. Poonam Bajwa plays a vetinary student in it.
What can the audience look forward to in this film? JD Chakravarthy is playing an important parallel role. He plays a city based villain. I am teaming up with Vadivelu for the first time and it’s a real fun film. It’s a breezy romantic comedy with the entertainment being almost like a Rajni film.
Where all have you shot ? We shot in Kumbakonan and Chennai.
So what are your expectations from this film? This is my 12th film so far. I am looking at a hat trick with Katcheri Arambam after the success of Thenavattu and Siva Manasula Sakthi. (laughs). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.164.246.194 (talk) 13:59, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Move Request
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No consensus, so not moved. Cybercobra (talk) 07:08, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Jeeva (actor) → Jiiva —Relisting. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:03, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
There is a redirect from Jiiva to here, but if this is the actors official homepage [1], it appears the other page should be the actual article and this the redirect. MM 207.69.137.43 (talk) 03:54, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- The press appears to refer to him as Jeeva [2] [3] so I am not sure which way this should go. MM 207.69.139.142 (talk) 05:21, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move per request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:25, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Jeeva (actor) → Jiiva – He is now being referred to and credited as such only. He has explicitly stated that he changed his name (see Times of India article). Also, as stated above, his official website confirms that Jiiva is his actual screen name now. Johannes003 (talk) 14:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Strong support: Mainly with reference to The Times of India reference :D -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 14:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support per Johannes. —Vensatry (Ping me) 23:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Contents of the filmography
editper policies, guidelines and manual of style as outlined in more detail [4] the filmography should not be formatted in a manner that promotes inclusion of trivia, gives undue weight to projects that are not completed vs actually existing films, does not take use of the columns to actually organize information by the stated column headers etc. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- WP:FILMOGRAPHY explains everything. An example of the style of filmography. Nothing more, nothing less. Projects that are not completed are films too, nowhere it is prohibited to add these into the table. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 14:30, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- 1) WP:FILMOGRAPHY does not stand a alone. as a project based guideline, it must follow and be subject to Wikipedia wide policies and guidelines. 2) projects that are not completed are NOT films. You cannot see a not completed project in a theater. you cannot see a not completed project on a DVD. 3) If you are requiring wording to be "explicit", you have not shown any explicit permission to include not completed projects.
- Given what you have presented is "nothing explicitly prohibits" and weighing that against all of the policies and guidelines and actual facts that I have outlined, I dont see that your position has any validity.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jiiva. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://archives.chennaionline.com/interviews/jeeva.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:52, 20 August 2018 (UTC)