Talk:Jill Marsden (EastEnders)

Suspects

The article says Ian, Mark and Lisa are the main suspects. What about Steve Owen (EastEnders) and Dan Sullivan? GunGagdin^Moan 19:08, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

This article quoting it only says them three, (direct quote)- Ian Beale, Lisa Shaw and Mark Fowler are all set for a grilling as police line up the prime suspects for the shooting of Phil Mitchell. Detectives are pointing the finger at the three, who all had runs-in with Phil (Steve McFadden) and don't have alibis for Thursday's shooting - watched by 17million viewers with 15.4million staying throughout. Monday's episode will show Ian (Adam Woodyatt) lying to cover his hatred of Phil who is fighting for his life." MayhemMario 19:10, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Marsden leaving

After Thursday's episode everyone removed Marsden from current lists as if she had gone. There was no indication that she had, as she said she would be in touch about Ben's crime (perverting justice). Just thought I'd say that. –anemoneprojectors– 12:47, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Sources

• Reception - JuneGloom Talk 00:43, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Hidden last date

Does anyone know the date of Marsden's last appearance? I think it was either the 17th or the 20th of August, but I cant be sure. Dont worry guys i'm not advocating classing her as a 'past' character, I just want to add her last date as a hidden comment incase this is her last appearance. Bleaney (talk) 16:10, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

The same for Ritchie Scott. Bleaney (talk) 16:21, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Marsden appeared on the 17th, Ritchie on the 20th. –anemoneprojectors– 10:42, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

two 2012 executive producers

I don't get why Lorraine Newman was listed as 2012 alongside Bryan Kirkwood. She's a recurring character, and I thought, alongside Aunt Sal, that if they re-appear within one year then it's fine?Arsenalfan24 (talk) 16:53, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jill Marsden (EastEnders)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Paul MacDermott (talk · contribs) 00:58, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Feeling pretty rotten about my comments concerning another Eastenders article, so I'll take this one for review. Having had a quick read through it, my initial thoughts are that it looks to be fairly good so there shouldn't be any major problems. I'll have a closer look though so give me a day or so to have a good read of it. Cheers Paul MacDermott (talk) 00:58, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

ok, here goes. I must mention before I begin that I haven't watched EastEnders for several years, so am not overly familiar with the later storylines, other that what I've read about them in the press. Mostly this seems to be fine to me. There are no dead links or disambiguation pages, and the prose is reasonably well-written. The storyline appears in the present tense, and the past tense is used for the background and reception. It's fairly in-depth with reliable citations throughout, and gives a good overview of the character. We also have a couple of images that seem to be ok. There's one or two things that should be addressed before it passes, but it's definitely heading in the right direction.

• Actual detectives thinking Marsden and her colleagues misrepresented their profession seems like a fairly big deal, so that should be included in the lead. Also a couple of quotes about her character would be nice.
• Related media You need to do a quick read through here for punctuation. I've spotted 'hasnt' and im'. This would be ok if it quotes a misspelling in a printed journal, but as it's from a video it should appear correctly. Also you've misspelled her name as Mardsen. I found a couple of other things earlier on, but have corrected those.

Overall comments

Fairly good article that's within sight of a pass. Just needs a couple of tweaks then it should be fine. I'll pop it on hold for a few days so you can address the points I've made above, and I'll keep an eye on this so I can close up once everything's done. Good luck. Paul MacDermott (talk) 17:18, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

ok, I've done these because M Mario is reviewing another article for GA and there isn't much to do here. Now it can pass. Paul MacDermott (talk) 13:26, 26 November 2012 (UTC)