Talk:Jocelyn Wildenstein
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 January 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was delete. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 24 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Comment
editSo why aren't there any picture of her?
- We need an image with a free license. We don't allow fair use for photographies of living persons, because someone could take a photo of the person and license it under a free license. --Enric Naval (talk) 17:53, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- I propose to use an external link to the Daily Mail, a British tabloid.[2] The Daily Mail has not been well received at WP:RSN, but many comments have said that it is context dependent - to avoid (?) controversy I propose to use only the external link without even including the title of the article or sourcing any statements from it. In theory, if we had better policies, we should take some of these images for Fair Use in the article with appropriate discussion. Wnt (talk) 01:50, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
![[2]](http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/02_03/Wildenstein1WENN_468x696.jpg){kind=link}
- I for one am extremely happy that this article does not have a picture of her. 99.226.40.134 (talk) 17:32, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Nonsense name in infobox
editI have removed the nonsense name from the infobox. This appears on several web pages but is inconsistently spelled in the reference provided (other pages have two "n"s rather than the three appearing here). Apart from its mention in the infobox it did not appear in the article. If restored, we need a reliable, accurate reference and reliably sourced context in the article justifying its inclusion. Removed text was:
Jocelynnys Dayannnys da Silva Bezerra[1]
--Mirokado (talk) 19:52, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
It is also reasonably clear that her correct birth name is Jocelyne Périsset, although this also appears in every imaginable anglicisation. I have updated the article to use that, following Konigsberg 1997 use of the first name, Alec N. Wildenstein and fr:Jocelyne Wildenstein. --Mirokado (talk) 19:52, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Some tidying up
editI have removed one of the inline refs to Carlin & McNeil 1998: we don't need three references to support one sentence that is not being challenged, one book and one online reference with relevant quote is enough. Also removed Lansky & McGinnis 2008 citation which is no longer used. --Mirokado (talk) 21:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Pilot
editPilot - sounds cool, and there is no proof of a French pilot license of hers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:46:1A7C:A324:65B1:FAF7:E8E8:8EE1 (talk) 02:02, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Editing Libelous recent edits.
editFirst please know that I am personal acquaintance of Mrs. Wildenstein. I have removed recent postings about a personal legal entanglement involving an argument with her friend Lloyd Klein. This information quoted from the Daily Mail is not of importance to this article. In fact the alleged incident which was grossly exaggerated in the gossip columns has been resolved and the New York Courts have dropped all charges. I've also edited the information regarding Mrs. Wildenstein's listing of her NY apartment. This is not important or pertinent to this article. Listing of comments on the value or current or previous listing prices especially when the listing is current have libelous consequences and are blatantly in defiance of Wiki policy.Fashionator (talk) 01:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- And I am the King of China and herewith order that the alterations by the person above be reversed instantly.
- Bravo on that quip and the reversal. 69.143.156.77 (talk) 17:37, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Birth year
editNumerous sources have either said she was born in 1940 or 1945…when was she born? 2600:100C:A211:7F18:4573:3C78:3EF5:2CF5 (talk) 05:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Inconsistencies in the year born
editOn the page she is said to be born on 1939, 1940 as well as 1945. 84.250.238.250 (talk) 23:53, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- ^ This! ^
- I came here to say that. 2603:6011:A600:46:E9D5:DA18:CA10:BF38 (talk) 17:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Born what year?
editThe article says 1945, quick facts 39-40. Which is it? Johangrimm (talk) 03:49, 4 October 2024 (UTC)