Talk:Joe Doyle (rugby league)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Joe Doyle / Joseph Doyle

edit

So at some point (at least when the disambig page was created) we had an article for Joseph Doyle the English RL player and a redlink for Joe Doyle the Aust RL player, thus enabling both articles to be distinguished (once they were both created). But now that the article on Joseph has been re-directed to the red-link title for Joe, the English RL player gets to use both. Surely that's not right ?-Sticks66 14:08, 13 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

This article was moved from Joseph Doyle (rugby league) to Joe Doyle (rugby league) as per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:OR since there are zero sources supporting 'Joseph'.--Gibson Flying V (talk) 03:38, 14 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joe Doyle (rugby league). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:15, 23 April 2017 (UTC)Reply