Talk:John Day (printer)

Lead

The lead is certainly too short for a FA, especially one appearing on the main page in a few days. Perhaps someone who knows more about the subject should expand it? Mattyness (talk) 09:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

I've lengthened it. qp10qp (talk) 04:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Type font

I removed this from the Actes and Monuments section:

[...] it is still considered one of the most beautiful Anglo-Saxon fonts ever produced

It would be nice to have some reference for this, otherwise it becomes a weasel term. JoaoRicardo 03:57, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Year of death

His year of death appears to be one year before it is claimed he sent in people to break up his son's premises. There is therefore a slight conflict on the dates.86.130.221.210 (talk) 00:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Clarified. qp10qp (talk) 13:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Think there is still a small discrepancy "In 1584, he sent men to break into..." and "Day died in 1583.."86.130.221.210 (talk) 21:04, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Whoops. Thanks for pointing that out. He died in 1584. Correction made. BuddingJournalist 21:10, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Criteria

I think that this article is to short for awardem. It is good but not great one.--Vojvodaen (talk) 18:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

I think it meets all of the criteria. RE: too short: Is there anything in particular you would like to see included in the article that isn't already there? Note that articles are judged on comprehensiveness (in this case, whether the major aspects of John Day's life is covered adequately), not some arbitrary set length. BuddingJournalist 19:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok. I accsept your arguments. I am new here so I dont understand all aspects of the Wikipedia.--Vojvodaen (talk) 20:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

That's OK. If you have any specific concerns about the article, please do post them (or be bold and edit the article ;]). Happy editing! BuddingJournalist 21:01, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Day (printer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110516133349/http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/johnfoxe/apparatus/evendenbiogjdayessay.html to http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/johnfoxe/apparatus/evendenbiogjdayessay.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110516135059/http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/johnfoxe/apparatus/evendenrobertsessay.html to http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/johnfoxe/apparatus/evendenrobertsessay.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 24 September 2017 (UTC)