Talk:John Golden Theatre/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 18:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Here we have another excellent article on the theatres of New York by Epicgenius which is once again likely to be close to Good Article status already. I will start my review soon. simongraham (talk) 18:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

This is a stable and well-written article. 97.7% of authorship is by Epicgenius. It is currently ranked B class and a DYK nominee.

• The article is of appropriate length, 4,047 words of readable prose, plus a referenced list of notable productions and an infobox.
• It is written in a summary style, consistent with relevant Manuals of Style.
• Citations seem to be thorough.
• References appear to be from reputable sources.
• Images have appropriate licensing and CC tags. They are main own work, including three from Epicgenius.
• Earwig's Copyvio Detector identifies a 35.1% chance of copyright violation with the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission report. I suggest looking at this and rewording if necessary.
• "A terracotta cornice and a band course runs above the ground floor." Is "a terracotta cornice and a band course" a singular noun?
• I see no other obvious spelling or grammar errors.

@Epicgenius: Please ping me when you would like me to take another look. simongraham (talk) 18:32, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

@simongraham, thanks for taking a look. I've addressed all of the above issues (the copyvio matches are almost all proper names). – Epicgenius (talk) 02:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

@Epicgenius: Thank you. I'll start the assessment now. simongraham (talk) 05:16, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Assessment

The six good article criteria:

1. It is reasonable well written.

   the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;

   it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

   all inline citations are from reliable sources;

   it contains no original research;

   it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism;

   it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.

3. It is broad in its coverage

   it addresses the main aspects of the topic.

   it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

4. It has a neutral point of view.

   it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.

5. It is stable.

   it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;

   images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Congratulations, Epicgenius. This article meets the criteria to be a Good Article.

Pass simongraham (talk) 05:18, 27 November 2021 (UTC)